Alaska 737 MAX 9 blowout pilot sues Boeing for defamation

written by Jake Nelson | January 8, 2026

The hole left in the side of an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 following the mid-air blowout of a door plug. (Image: NTSB)

The pilot of an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 that saw a door plug blow out mid-flight in January 2024 has sued Boeing, claiming that the planemaker “scapegoated” him over the incident.

Captain Brandon Fisher is seeking US$10 million ($14.9 million) in damages from Boeing for personal injury, defamation, emotional distress, and other complaints over “reprehensible and inaccurate” statements the company made following the incident on Alaska Airlines flight 1282.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

In the lawsuit, filed on 30 December, lawyers for Fisher – who has himself been sued by two passengers – say that he and his first officer, Emily Wiprud, “landed the aircraft safely despite harrowing circumstances in the cockpit”.

“They should have been hailed as heroes. Instead, The Boeing Company attempted to shift blame, intentionally and falsely claiming that Captain Fisher and First Officer Wiprud made mistakes that contributed to the incident,” the court filing reads.

“Boeing’s reaction betrayed the lack of corporate integrity that has become all too clear in the wake of other recent, and often deadly, manufacturing mistakes. Boeing’s actions have had a dramatic and life-altering impact on Captain Fisher.

 
 

“Captain Fisher brings this suit to hold Boeing and its complicit subcontractor, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. accountable for what they have done to him and the danger that their actions posed to the public. In the absence of integrity, Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems must find consequence.”

The suit claims that Boeing’s “negligence and systemic failures resulted in the creation of an unsafe aircraft not fit for flight”, which resulted in the decompression event.

Boeing subsequently claimed in its response to a lawsuit brought by passengers that it should not be held liable because its products had been “improperly maintained or misused by persons and/or entities other than Boeing”.

“Boeing knew this statement was false at the time it was made, but made it anyway as part of its often-used post-accident strategy to blame pilots for incidents caused solely by its own actions,” the filing read.

“It was clear Boeing’s words were directed at Captain Fisher in attempt to paint him as the scapegoat for Boeing’s numerous failures.

“Because [subsequent news] articles contained a link to Boeing’s answer, the entire world could see that Boeing believed Captain Fisher and others were responsible for the incident, despite Captain Fisher’s heroic actions that led to a safe emergency landing.

“This accusation, despite its lacking any semblance of truth, only heightened the emotional impact and distress experienced by Captain Fisher.”

The US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) last year said the probable cause of the blowout was Boeing’s failure to “provide adequate training, guidance and oversight” to its factory workers, also blaming the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for failing to ensure Boeing fixed “repetitive and systemic” nonconformance issues associated with its parts removal process.

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA