iscover
The ATSB has urged engineers to check aircraft documents when conducting maintenance after it emerged a Cessna 441 took off with vital oil lines fitted into the wrong ports.
The Conquest II turboprop aircraft, carrying nine passengers, diverted and landed without incident after the pilot noticed abnormal torque fluctuations in September 2021.
However, in 1990, the engine’s manufacturer, Honeywell, issued a letter that noted similar mix-ups had occurred several times on similar aircraft.
The ATSB’s director of transport safety, Dr Mike Walker, said, “The oil lines could be easily transposed, given they were long and flexible enough to each reach either port, and they were the same size, used the same thread, and were almost identical in appearance.”
The full investigation reveals how the twin-engined aircraft was flying from Sawfish Camp to Darwin when the pilot observed abnormal torque fluctuations, as well as high oil pressure and high oil temperature indications, from the right TPE-331 engine.
The pilot diverted the aircraft to Tindal Airport and landed uneventfully. Later checks identified that the air/oil cooler return line and air/oil separator vent line had been incorrectly transposed during a recent engine change.
Dr Walker said that since there was no record of which engineer had done the work, it was not possible to determine whether there were any individual or environmental factors associated with the error, or the extent to which the available maintenance documentation had been checked.
After the oil line issue was rectified, there were further abnormal indications from the right engine during a flight about three weeks after the initial occurrence. After landing, the reduction gearbox scavenge pump was found to be unserviceable.
The ATSB’s final report states the incorrect oil flow resulting from the transposed oil lines had damaged the engine’s air/oil separator, which then increased the reduction gearbox scavenge pump pressure. This compromised the structural integrity of the pump housing.
“These additional problems had not been detected during the initial maintenance,” Dr Walker said.
The ATSB’s final report into the incident notes that in 1990 the engine’s manufacturer, Honeywell, issued a service information letter (SIL) advising the oil lines had been transposed on several previous occasions on similar aircraft.
Following this occurrence, the operator, Chartair, commenced a fleet-wide program to add markings to engine oil tanks, conducted toolbox talks with engineering staff about distractions during maintenance, and began documenting each stage of engine changes.
In addition, Honeywell reissued the SIL with additional information and guidance.
“This investigation highlights to maintenance engineers that it is important to check relevant documentation rather than relying on experience and memory, and to remain familiar with other data such as manufacturer service information letters,” Dr Walker said.
“Further, since maintenance documents do not always provide advice on non-routine technical situations, operators and maintainers should seek technical advice from the manufacturer to ensure that non-routine problems are fully rectified prior to releasing an aircraft to service.”
allister polkinghorne
says:This is a know problem because the Cessna Maintenance instructions are incorrect. There at least one previous occurrence in Australia and if CASA and the ATSB were on their game, the issue wouldn’t keep coming up. SDRs or their equivalent were raised in a least one previous incident that I am aware of.