australian aviation logo

Melbourne Airport proposes north-south orientation for third runway

written by australianaviation.com.au | November 14, 2019

An aerial view of Melbourne Airport at night. (Australian Aviation archive)
An aerial view of Melbourne Airport at night. (Australian Aviation archive)

Melbourne Airport has confirmed a change of preference for a planned third runway, which it now wants to run in parallel to the existing north-south runway.

The move away from the previous east-west orientation was flagged in June, when the airport first announced it was having technical consultations with government, airlines and regulatory bodies about a change of direction.

On Thursday, the airport said in a statement on its website it would “move forward with plans to build a third runway in a north-south orientation” following an extensive planning review and months of consultations.

“The new runway will increase capacity to keep up with Victoria’s growth demands, provide economic benefits to the state and improve traveller experience by creating opportunities to add more destinations and frequent flights,” it said.

A map of the proposed third runway. (Melbourne Airport)
A map of the proposed third runway. (Melbourne Airport)
The proposed third runway approvals process. (Melbourne Airport)
The proposed third runway approvals process. (Melbourne Airport)

The change of direction comes six years after Melbourne Airport stated its preferred orientation for the third runway to run east-west in its 2013 Master Plan. Those plans were reaffirmed in the 2018 Master Plan.


However, the airport now believed a north-south runway would have minimal closures based on crosswind modelling and offer greater capacity based on airport operations and aircraft taxiing.

In terms of next steps, Melbourne Airport said it would spend the next 12 to 18 months “undertaking extensive modelling, assessment and development of approval documentation”, with a Preliminary Draft Major Development Plan (MDP) to be released for public comment in early 2021.

Should the plans be approved, construction would start in 2022 and the new runway would be operational in 2025. This would be two years later than the airport’s 2018 Master Plan, which said the third runway was expected to be built and in use by 2023.

The timeline for proposed new north-south runway. (Melbourne Airport)
The timeline for the proposed new north-south runway. (Melbourne Airport)

Meanwhile, the long-term outlook for the airport was to eventually have four runways.

“To keep growing, and to keep up with our growing population, tourism and business needs, a third runway must be built,” Melbourne Airport chief executive Lyell Strambi said in a video posted on the Melbourne Airport YouTube channel.

“For travellers, this means opening up more international destinations to visit, more frequent flights and of course lower air airfares.

“And perhaps the most important thing, reduced delays, saving time for passengers.”

Strambi said a third runway would also support additional freight capacity at Melbourne Airport.

Currently, Tullamarine operates with two runways. The longer Runway 16/34 measures 3.7km, while a shorter Runway 09/27 is 2.3km long.

Victoria Tourism Industry Council chief executive Felicia Mariani backed the proposed new north-south runway at Tullamarine, noting it was expected to be operational for almost the whole year, in contract to an east-west runway that would be operational 70-80 per cent of the time due to the prevailing winds.

“With more than 37 million people arriving last financial year, it’s clear there needs to be a plan to manage anticipated growth efficiently,” Mariani said in a statement on Thursday.

“We applaud Melbourne Airport for investing in this future growth and committing to a third runway.”

VIDEO: Chief executive Lyell Strambi talks about the proposed new third runway in a video posted on the airport’s YouTube channel.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (5)

  • Patrickk


    It then becomes like US airports like Detroit with very long taxiing across an existing runway. Quite the opposite of the earlier justification for the east west runway.

    • Lechuga


      In my opinion the best place for a new runway would be to the east where the current freeway is. But that’s almost impossible now.

  • Geoff


    Completely in line (pardon pun) with Masterplan. Simply prioritising RWY 16R/34L over 09R/27L. Therefore no surprises.

  • Adrian P


    A second 16/34 runway is the way to go because the existing 16/34 runway is the primary runway.
    Next stage develop terminals in the centre of the airfield, as per Heathrow, Brisbane,West Sydney and Perth (who recognised the error and are moving their terminals to the centre of the airfield)
    Next stage scrap the four runway option and the existing 09/27 for ultimate efficiency.

    • reeves35


      I think you are correct in that the next major terminal development will be a mid-field terminal probably replacing the existing international T2 with T2 being turned over to domestic operations. Road & rail alignment will probably mean the landside terminal will probably remain in the general area of the current terminal complex with an underground shuttle to the airside terminal similar to what you see in KUL.

      Planning requirements etc mean timeframes in Australia are slow by international standards so it is probably likely that this type of development is not possible before about 2030.

Comments are closed.

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.