Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
australian aviation logo

Curfew not the solution to aircraft noise, says Brisbane Airport

written by Jake Nelson | February 17, 2026

An aerial view of Brisbane Airport’s international terminal. (Image: Brisbane Airport)

Brisbane Airport has pushed back against claims that a nighttime curfew would have a minimal impact on the Queensland economy.

A report from a University of Queensland economist, commissioned by the Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA), has asserted that banning night flights would cost only around $10 million per year, but could generate at least $50 million in “health and economic benefits”.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

Speaking about the report, its author, professor John Quiggin, said a curfew “would not ground the economy but it would finally let Brisbane residents sleep”.

“On conservative estimates, Brisbane residents are collectively losing up to $100 million per year in the form of sleep disruption, elevated health risks, reduced quality of life, and depressed land values,” he said.

“The imposition of a curfew would yield health benefits from reduced coronary attacks and other severe effects of around $100 million per year.

==
==

“Hedonic land valuations, which incorporate less severe effects such as annoyance, yield much higher values, ranging from $200 million to $350 million. A curfew would also yield benefits in the form of reduced public subsidies.”

The Quiggin report proposes a curfew between 10pm and 6am, slightly longer than Sydney’s, with freight able to be shifted to Toowoomba Wellcamp at “minimal cost”.

Professor Quiggin also labelled as “analytically unsound” the suggestion that aviation, as an essential service, should be “exempt from regulatory constraint”.

“Industries that generate externalities – whether transport, manufacturing, or energy – are commonly subject to operating limits, particularly during sensitive night hours,” he said.

“It is time to bring Brisbane Airport into line with the rest of the country. A curfew is standard policy, not radical reform.”

The airport, however, has rubbished the BFPCA’s claims, and said the Quiggin report “understates the real-world harm that flight caps and a curfew would inflict on everyday Queenslanders”.

In a statement, Henry Tuttiett, the airport’s executive general manager for communications, said key claims in a previous version of the analysis had been “comprehensively refuted” at a 2024 Senate inquiry into aircraft noise.

“The report relies on assumptions that have already been academically analysed and disputed, particularly claims about property value impacts,” he said.

“Queensland University of Technology analysis of more than 180,000 residential sales over 36 years found no evidence of long-term price reductions or weaker capital growth in suburbs under flight paths.

“In many cases, these areas performed as well as, or better than comparable suburbs, with factors such as proximity to the CBD, access to key transport hubs including the airport, existing house prices, schools, amenities and socio-economic profile, impacting property values.”

According to Tuttiett, potential impacts of a curfew on Queenslanders could include higher airfares, reduced flight options, fewer international connections, and the loss of vital regional services.

“The report also fails to account for the fact that Brisbane Airport’s 24-hour operations are critical to industries that underpin the Queensland economy, particularly tourism and time-sensitive exports, the resources industry and crucial healthcare services.”

“Previous economic analysis has estimated the real reduction in activity at $2.3 billion by 2031-32; and $5.5 billion by 2041-42. The reduction in employment is estimated at 24,542 jobs by 2031-32; and 57,922 jobs by 2041-42.

“The BFPCA report assumes that caps and curfews are the only way to deliver relief to affected communities, while overlooking practical and less economically damaging alternatives, including improved flight path optimisation, maximisation of the proportion of aircraft operating over Moreton Bay, and the accelerated rollout of newer, quieter aircraft.”

Airservices in 2024 began a rollout of noise reduction plans at Brisbane Airport, including increased use of Parallel Runway Operations (SODPROPS), which allows more flights to take off and land over Moreton Bay rather than populated areas of the city.

“Brisbane Airport welcomed the outcomes of the Senate Inquiry into the mitigation of aircraft noise, and is committed to working closely with airlines, Airservices Australia and government to minimise aircraft noise for local communities,” Tuttiett said.

Noise issues have been a flashpoint at Brisbane Airport since the completion of its new parallel runway in July 2020, which allowed more flight paths to open up, but affected nearby communities in the process.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (2)

  • John Mason

    says:

    “The Quiggin report proposes a curfew between 10pm and 6am, slightly longer than Sydney’s, with freight able to be shifted to Toowoomba Wellcamp at “minimal cost”.”

    This is a massive generalization and fails to take into account the importance for QLD Businesses and Exporters, and economic value of Air Cargo for QLD; all relying on a 24/7 Air Cargo Hub at BNE Airport.

  • If one wants to complain about noise with a view to changing, say, an airport operation, you find someone/authority who can support your view and come up with unsupported statements that they claim is a viable alternative.
    Unfortunately, the alternatives are seldom viable but full of self interest. Again, a curfew at Brisbane would have serious consequences with operations from/to our near Asian and some Middle Eastern countries effecting our national interests and the intermittent noise problems caused as a result of wind direction has been known since the planning days of the new Brisbane Airport. New technology engines are getting quieter, just think yourself lucky that B727-200 and B737-100 etal are no longer around. Simply said folks, if the noise bothers you check out “realestate.com”

Leave a Comment

Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA