australian aviation logo

Aerobatic aircraft crashed into back of hovering G2 helicopter

written by Adam Thorn | October 12, 2021

The damaged propeller of the two-seat Extra EA-300, VH-EXR, which crashed into a Guimbal Cabri G2 (ATSB).

A high-performance aerobatic aircraft crashed into the rear of a Guimbal Cabri G2 helicopter hovering above a runway in the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, in September 2020.

The incident saw the two-seat Extra EA-300’s propeller collide with the helicopter’s fuselage, and the G2’s landing skid in return puncture the aircraft’s fuel tank. None of the three pilots involved were injured.

An ATSB investigation has concluded that the Extra’s nose-high attitude during landing obscured the hovering helicopter from sight until immediately before the crash, meaning those on board were unable to take evasive action.

“The ATSB found the pilots of the Extra did not expect the helicopter to join the 1,000 feet circuit pattern and did not assimilate the helicopter pilot’s radio calls into their mental models of the current operations at the airport,” said the ATSB’s director of transport safety, Stuart Macleod. “As a result, they were not aware that the helicopter was ahead of them in the circuit.”

The organisation said the incident highlights the importance of pilots being aware of the circuit procedures for differing kinds of aircraft.


On 18 September 2020, a two-seat Extra EA-300 aircraft, VH-EXR, with two experienced pilots onboard was conducting circuits at 1,000 feet (above airport elevation) at Caloundra Airport, a non-towered airport where aircraft self-separate from each other using radio calls on the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF).

The pilot-in-command occupied the Extra’s front seat and was conducting a check flight of the rear-seat pilot.

A two-seat Guimbal Cabri G2 helicopter, VH-LTO, with a solo student pilot on board conducting a navigation exercise flight from Redcliffe, joined the circuit ahead of the Extra and was conducting a stop-and-go on the active runway.

The Extra landed on the runway behind it, and during the landing roll collided with the rear of the hovering helicopter, resulting in substantial damage to both aircraft. The helicopter sustained multiple propeller strikes underneath the cabin and separation of its right landing skid.

Propeller strike mark and skid damage to VH-LTO (ATSB).

The Extra’s wooden propeller was destroyed by the impact with the helicopter’s fuselage and landing skid, which punctured the Extra’s right wing fuel tank. Fortunately, there were no injuries.

The ATSB also identified that, on the final leg of the circuit, the pilots of the Extra were focused on a third aircraft in the circuit, which was ahead of the helicopter, and which they had been in radio communications with.

“While the pilots visually scanned the runway prior to landing, they were not aware of the helicopter’s presence, and they perceived a different aircraft to be the next ahead of them in the circuit, which resulted in them not sighting the helicopter and continuing the approach to the runway,” Macleod said.

Further, the tail-dragger Extra’s nose-high attitude during landing obscured the hovering helicopter until immediately before the collision.

Leading edge wing damage and fuel tank puncture of VH-EXR (ATSB)

During interviews with the ATSB, the rear-seat pilot reported an expectation that helicopters would generally remain clear of circuit traffic, and that they have never known helicopters to hover over runways, while the front-seat pilot noted that helicopters regularly approach Caloundra but most remain clear of the circuit.

Macleod said the accident highlights the importance for pilots to have an awareness of the circuit procedures for different types of aircraft at non-towered airports, including helicopters.

“A helicopter performing a stop-and-go will usually require significantly more time to clear the runway, compared to an aeroplane performing a touch-and-go,” he said.

“Around CTAF and uncontrolled airports there is the possibility of aeroplanes and helicopters conducting movements that might not be considered commonplace. This investigation highlights that multiple options are available to helicopters at non-towered airports, including the active 1,000 feet circuit pattern.”

Although not a factor in this occurrence, due to the speed of the Extra it could be classified as a high-performance aircraft, as it is capable of a downwind speed of greater than 150 kt, allowing it to fly a circuit at 1,500 feet.

“All pilots are reminded that the 1,500 feet circuit height is not just limited to regular passenger transport and turbine aircraft,” Macleod said.

Safety around non-towered airports is one of the ATSB’s eight ‘most wanted’ safety priorities, as part of the SafetyWatch initiative.

“The alerting provided by radio broadcasts at non-towered airports such as Caloundra greatly assists the process of sighting traffic that might be a collision risk,” Macleod noted.

“This accident reinforces that, even for experienced pilots, visual identification of unknown traffic is difficult.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (2)

  • martin hone


    No mention of the helicopter pilot had made his intentions clear. A classic case of seeing what you expect to see.

  • Grant Piper


    why do helos use the runways anyway? Why would a helo do a ‘stop and go’ if the pilot was aware of other circuit traffic they might inconvenience? this is a case of blindly complying with regulations that put two aircraft in the same spot rather than using common sense and at least using the grass within the flight strip.

Comments are closed.

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.