Close sidebar

Airservices to review Brisbane flight paths amid growing community outrage

written by Hannah Dowling | August 3, 2021
New Brisbane Airport flight paths released ahead of the opening of its new $1.1 billion parallel runway

Airservices Australia is set to complete a 12-month review into whether or not Brisbane Airport’s new flight paths have increased noise pollution, following the opening of the airport’s new parallel runway.

It comes as residents of Brisbane’s inner-city suburbs grow increasingly frustrated over excessive noise caused by aircraft movements, which they claim has not met the expectations set in consultation with the community prior to the runway’s approval.

The government-owned organisation has officially commenced its Post Implementation Review (PIR) process of Brisbane’s new flight paths, 12 months after the airport’s new runway opened, and new flight paths introduced.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Airservices is regularly responsible for performing reviews into new airport infrastructure and flight path changes.

The review will essentially look to investigate whether or not actual noise and aircraft operations following the opening of the new runway are in line with what was modelled in earlier flight path design and environmental assessment processes.

The process will “identify where any variances may have occurred and the causes of these variances”, according to Airservices.

Following the review’s commencement, Airservices has released the first draft of its terms of reference (ToR), which is now open for public comment for the next five weeks.

PROMOTED CONTENT

“This first draft of the ToR has been developed for community review and comment. A final ToR will be confirmed following engagement with the community and other stakeholders,” Airservices said in the document.

Interested parties have until midnight on Sunday, 5 September 2021 to provide comment on the current draft ToR, and a public meeting to discuss the review and the ToR will be scheduled for mid-August, according to Airservices.

The draft document makes reference to a recent investigation by the Aircraft Noise Ombudsman (ANO) into increased noise pollution due to Brisbane’s new flight paths, launched in December.

The ANO is yet to finalise the results of its investigation and provide its recommendations, however this information “will be incorporated” into future drafts of the ToR for its own review, according to Airservices.

While the review is slated to take 12 months, it could take up to 18 months to complete.

Residents of Brisbane’s inner-city suburbs, including New Farm, Bulimba, Teneriffe, Hamilton and Hawthorn, have spent months lobbying and protesting against excessive aircraft noise pollution over their homes following the introduction of Brisbane’s second parallel runway.

Last week, Australian Aviation reported that a community alliance campaigning against excessive noise generated from Brisbane’s Airport’s new runway is claiming flight paths need to be reworked from scratch.

David Diamond, chair and spokesperson for the Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA), said community expectations outlined in a 2007 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) have not been met.

Brisbane Airport’s new runway opened one year ago but the business has consistently denied new flight paths have made the noise worse and argued it has been actively engaging with the community.

Ahead of Brisbane Airport Corporation (BAC) first breaking ground on the construction of its second runway in 2012, the airport’s operator was required to release a Major Development Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (MDP/EIS), to be made available to the public for comment.

However, according to the BFPCA, current airport operations have now deviated heavily from the initial MDP/EIS that was presented to those living under flight paths.

“We don’t believe that current operations and noise pollution are what was to be expected under the original EIS,” Diamond said.

“This is why we feel that there is a full rework required, in order to come up with the best solution. We want to know why the noise levels are so high, and why many things that were in the EIS were not delivered as expected.”

In response to increasing outrage, BAC has strongly denied the group’s claims and recently said in response it never misled the community when it released the EIS approved by the federal government in 2007.

Last month, BAC published a report suggesting its new $1.1 billion parallel runway had not made aircraft noise pollution worse, and actually reduced the amount of aircraft that fly over the city’s inner-city suburbs at night.

The airport has also welcomed Airservices’ upcoming PIR, which will seek out whether or not Brisbane’s current operations have deviated from the 2007 EIS.

Steer your own in-flight experience – available on print and digital Whether our classic glossy magazine in your letterbox, daily news updates in your inbox, peeling back a few layers in the podcast or our monthly current affair reports, you can count on us to keep you up to date. Sign up today for just $99.95 for more exclusive offers here. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

6 Comments

  • Mitchell

    says:

    It’ll be interesting to read the result of this review, when it’s published within the next possible two years’.

    People will still buy houses under flight paths to live in so-called ‘elite’ ie ‘snob-value suburbs’, or to be in ‘catchment areas’ of top-notch private schools.
    This will never change, yet they’ll complain about ‘aircraft noise’, when it suits.

    Where I’m at is on a main N-S-N, & NE flight paths’. Having heard aircrafts all my life above, they don’t worry me.
    I hear the klaxon of suburban trains, which is loud, when the wind is this way, & that train line is 7 kms away.

  • Nicholas

    says:

    I live under a flight path and its not the end of the world folks. Suggest the Brisbane “noise” is from a small bunch of wealthy residents….

  • While I am not affected by the aircraft noise created by the new flight paths, as an aviation enthusiast, I am gobsmacked at some of the new flight paths designed by Airservices Australia.

    While most of the complaints will no doubt relate to the noise created by aircraft departing Brisbane, such as the new BIXAD ONE departure from runway 19R, the design of some of the new flight paths is astonishing.

    One example is the MORBI ONE arrival for runway 01L for prop jets landing from the north. Instead of being able to head south-east of intersection DAYBO and follow the “River Track” which brought onto the 3NM final for runway 01R as per the old SMOKA FIVE VICTOR arrival, they have effectively doubled the flight distance to the airport by making the prop jets head south-west from DAYBO for almost 10 miles at between 5000 and 7000ft before undertaking a large wide turn which brings them onto the 15NM final to runway 01L.

    Meanwhile jets from the north are able swoop underneath them flying low over the inner western suburbs of Brisbane on the SMOKA NINE X-RAY arrival onto runway 01L creating all sorts of noise pollution for people living in these areas.

  • John

    says:

    I would expect none of the complainants were around when the 707 and DC8 were flying. Aircraft today are quiet and really nothing to complain about when living in today’s society.

    • Vannus

      says:

      Yes, John, & they’ve obviously never heard the wonderful Lockheed L188C ‘Electra’, coming into land either!
      What a powerful craft it was with the ALLISON Props.
      Loved all the flights done in it, including a 2am flight to POM in mid-‘60’s.

  • Ian dobbs

    says:

    I was living in this suburb before the new runway was commissioned. Aircraft noise was around but bearable. Due to COVID the air traffic has dropped 80% so that has had an impact on the amount of air noise. Given when we reopen after COVID, there will be 30% more flights than before, noise levels all day will come into effect as more planes come in to land & takeoff.
    When the runway was under construction, locals were promised the amount of air traffic over the city would drop dramatically with more flights coming in & going out over the bay. This looked very promising.
    Tonight, every flight has been directed over the city to come in from the south west, even the internationals from Singapore & New Zealand. Singapore maybe but NZ no way.
    I have snapshots of the flight tracker inform& wind direction weather to back this up

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Airservices to review Brisbane flight paths amid growing community outrage

written by Hannah Dowling | August 3, 2021
New Brisbane Airport flight paths released ahead of the opening of its new $1.1 billion parallel runway

Airservices Australia is set to complete a 12-month review into whether or not Brisbane Airport’s new flight paths have increased noise pollution, following the opening of the airport’s new parallel runway.

It comes as residents of Brisbane’s inner-city suburbs grow increasingly frustrated over excessive noise caused by aircraft movements, which they claim has not met the expectations set in consultation with the community prior to the runway’s approval.

The government-owned organisation has officially commenced its Post Implementation Review (PIR) process of Brisbane’s new flight paths, 12 months after the airport’s new runway opened, and new flight paths introduced.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Airservices is regularly responsible for performing reviews into new airport infrastructure and flight path changes.

The review will essentially look to investigate whether or not actual noise and aircraft operations following the opening of the new runway are in line with what was modelled in earlier flight path design and environmental assessment processes.

The process will “identify where any variances may have occurred and the causes of these variances”, according to Airservices.

Following the review’s commencement, Airservices has released the first draft of its terms of reference (ToR), which is now open for public comment for the next five weeks.

PROMOTED CONTENT

“This first draft of the ToR has been developed for community review and comment. A final ToR will be confirmed following engagement with the community and other stakeholders,” Airservices said in the document.

Interested parties have until midnight on Sunday, 5 September 2021 to provide comment on the current draft ToR, and a public meeting to discuss the review and the ToR will be scheduled for mid-August, according to Airservices.

The draft document makes reference to a recent investigation by the Aircraft Noise Ombudsman (ANO) into increased noise pollution due to Brisbane’s new flight paths, launched in December.

The ANO is yet to finalise the results of its investigation and provide its recommendations, however this information “will be incorporated” into future drafts of the ToR for its own review, according to Airservices.

While the review is slated to take 12 months, it could take up to 18 months to complete.

Residents of Brisbane’s inner-city suburbs, including New Farm, Bulimba, Teneriffe, Hamilton and Hawthorn, have spent months lobbying and protesting against excessive aircraft noise pollution over their homes following the introduction of Brisbane’s second parallel runway.

Last week, Australian Aviation reported that a community alliance campaigning against excessive noise generated from Brisbane’s Airport’s new runway is claiming flight paths need to be reworked from scratch.

David Diamond, chair and spokesperson for the Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA), said community expectations outlined in a 2007 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) have not been met.

Brisbane Airport’s new runway opened one year ago but the business has consistently denied new flight paths have made the noise worse and argued it has been actively engaging with the community.

Ahead of Brisbane Airport Corporation (BAC) first breaking ground on the construction of its second runway in 2012, the airport’s operator was required to release a Major Development Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (MDP/EIS), to be made available to the public for comment.

However, according to the BFPCA, current airport operations have now deviated heavily from the initial MDP/EIS that was presented to those living under flight paths.

“We don’t believe that current operations and noise pollution are what was to be expected under the original EIS,” Diamond said.

“This is why we feel that there is a full rework required, in order to come up with the best solution. We want to know why the noise levels are so high, and why many things that were in the EIS were not delivered as expected.”

In response to increasing outrage, BAC has strongly denied the group’s claims and recently said in response it never misled the community when it released the EIS approved by the federal government in 2007.

Last month, BAC published a report suggesting its new $1.1 billion parallel runway had not made aircraft noise pollution worse, and actually reduced the amount of aircraft that fly over the city’s inner-city suburbs at night.

The airport has also welcomed Airservices’ upcoming PIR, which will seek out whether or not Brisbane’s current operations have deviated from the 2007 EIS.

Steer your own in-flight experience – available on print and digital Whether our classic glossy magazine in your letterbox, daily news updates in your inbox, peeling back a few layers in the podcast or our monthly current affair reports, you can count on us to keep you up to date. Sign up today for just $99.95 for more exclusive offers here. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

6 Comments

  • Mitchell

    says:

    It’ll be interesting to read the result of this review, when it’s published within the next possible two years’.

    People will still buy houses under flight paths to live in so-called ‘elite’ ie ‘snob-value suburbs’, or to be in ‘catchment areas’ of top-notch private schools.
    This will never change, yet they’ll complain about ‘aircraft noise’, when it suits.

    Where I’m at is on a main N-S-N, & NE flight paths’. Having heard aircrafts all my life above, they don’t worry me.
    I hear the klaxon of suburban trains, which is loud, when the wind is this way, & that train line is 7 kms away.

  • Nicholas

    says:

    I live under a flight path and its not the end of the world folks. Suggest the Brisbane “noise” is from a small bunch of wealthy residents….

  • While I am not affected by the aircraft noise created by the new flight paths, as an aviation enthusiast, I am gobsmacked at some of the new flight paths designed by Airservices Australia.

    While most of the complaints will no doubt relate to the noise created by aircraft departing Brisbane, such as the new BIXAD ONE departure from runway 19R, the design of some of the new flight paths is astonishing.

    One example is the MORBI ONE arrival for runway 01L for prop jets landing from the north. Instead of being able to head south-east of intersection DAYBO and follow the “River Track” which brought onto the 3NM final for runway 01R as per the old SMOKA FIVE VICTOR arrival, they have effectively doubled the flight distance to the airport by making the prop jets head south-west from DAYBO for almost 10 miles at between 5000 and 7000ft before undertaking a large wide turn which brings them onto the 15NM final to runway 01L.

    Meanwhile jets from the north are able swoop underneath them flying low over the inner western suburbs of Brisbane on the SMOKA NINE X-RAY arrival onto runway 01L creating all sorts of noise pollution for people living in these areas.

  • John

    says:

    I would expect none of the complainants were around when the 707 and DC8 were flying. Aircraft today are quiet and really nothing to complain about when living in today’s society.

    • Vannus

      says:

      Yes, John, & they’ve obviously never heard the wonderful Lockheed L188C ‘Electra’, coming into land either!
      What a powerful craft it was with the ALLISON Props.
      Loved all the flights done in it, including a 2am flight to POM in mid-‘60’s.

  • Ian dobbs

    says:

    I was living in this suburb before the new runway was commissioned. Aircraft noise was around but bearable. Due to COVID the air traffic has dropped 80% so that has had an impact on the amount of air noise. Given when we reopen after COVID, there will be 30% more flights than before, noise levels all day will come into effect as more planes come in to land & takeoff.
    When the runway was under construction, locals were promised the amount of air traffic over the city would drop dramatically with more flights coming in & going out over the bay. This looked very promising.
    Tonight, every flight has been directed over the city to come in from the south west, even the internationals from Singapore & New Zealand. Singapore maybe but NZ no way.
    I have snapshots of the flight tracker inform& wind direction weather to back this up

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year