Close sidebar

NZ drone pilot convicted after collision with paraglider

written by Hannah Dowling | February 19, 2021

A file image of a drone.

A New Zealand man has been convicted and fined after he crashed his drone into a trainee paraglider in 2018.

The drone and paraglider collided mid-air at Kariotahi Beach, south of Auckland.

Advertisement
Advertisement

According to court documents, the DJI Phantom 3 drone collided with the paraglider about 100 metres above the ground, and became entangled in one of the paraglider’s brake lines, making steering difficult.

Luckily, the paraglider managed to land unhurt, however was shaken by the incident.

The man, a recreational drone pilot, was convicted at the Manukau District Court on Thursday, and fined $1,000 for operating a drone in a manner that cause unnecessary endangerment, and failing to give way and keep clear of a manned aircraft.

He is the first to be convinced in New Zealand for a crash between a drone and a manned aircraft.

PROMOTED CONTENT

Dean Winter, the deputy chief executive of aviation safety at the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, said it was extremely lucky that the paraglider was not killed or seriously injured in the crash.

He added that he hopes Thursday’s conviction of the drone pilot will encourage other drone users to rigorously follow CAA drone rules, which specify that pilots must keep their drone within sight, and land immediately when manned aircraft are nearby.

“This conviction shows there can be real consequences when drone users fail to follow the rules and put the lives of others at risk through their lack of understanding or carelessness,” Winter said.

“Although the pilot of the paraglider was able to safely walk away after the collision, the accident was deceptively dangerous and it was only down to sheer luck and the skill of the paraglider that there wasn’t a death that day.”

The drone pilot’s conviction and fine followed a judge-alone trial, where Judge Mina Wharepouri found the man guilty of the laid charges.

The drone pilot, who purchased his drone in 2016, reportedly told the court that he was not aware that Karioitahi Beach was popular with paragliders.

The man did admit that he saw a paraglider fly past him while he was at the beach, though argued that his action on the day of the accident were without fault.

However, Judge Wharepouri stated that the man should have immediately landed his drone when he became aware of the paragliders, and appreciated that this drone “might pose a hazard to others in the air sharing the same airspace”.

The judge also stated that the man was not following CAA guidelines, and was overly reliant on tracking the drone via its screen, rather than keeping the drone within his direct line of sight.

25% off starts now! Australian Aviation magazine Cyber Monday sale is now live. Have the very best of Australian Aviation’s annual print and digital subscription. This includes every In Focus and Behind the Lens digital magazine, special coverage, exclusive photos and editions you may have miss. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

5 Comments

  • Karl Valentin

    says:

    $1,000 for nearly killing someone. He got off lightly.

    • Andy M Ronayne

      says:

      I agree entirely- $1k is hardly a deterrent.

      • Ron

        says:

        At least $100,000 would be a start as a deterrent IMHO.
        Psychologically interesting that it’s the morons’ of the world who have the funds to pay for life-threatening ‘toys’.

  • Tim

    says:

    Drones’ are being operated by idiots’ who are selfish, & have no regards for others’.
    The paraglider in this case was just very lucky he wasn’t killed.
    Governments’ should set up particular areas’ where drones can be used, or risk a person being killed, or an aircraft being downed.

  • Dennis

    says:

    In Sydney we have a huge problem that has been reported but not yet acted on. The maps that most drone users seem to use does not have the Victor One lane off the coast of Sydney shown at all. Drone pilots are taking pictures over areas like Cronulla in complete ignorance to the fact that light aircraft transit the area at 500 feet. I have seen images posted on Facebook that were taken higher than 500 feet. It is only a matter of time before a drone goes through the windscreen of a light aircraft in Victor One laneway.

Leave a Comment to Tim Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NZ drone pilot convicted after collision with paraglider

written by Hannah Dowling | February 19, 2021

A file image of a drone.

A New Zealand man has been convicted and fined after he crashed his drone into a trainee paraglider in 2018.

The drone and paraglider collided mid-air at Kariotahi Beach, south of Auckland.

Advertisement
Advertisement

According to court documents, the DJI Phantom 3 drone collided with the paraglider about 100 metres above the ground, and became entangled in one of the paraglider’s brake lines, making steering difficult.

Luckily, the paraglider managed to land unhurt, however was shaken by the incident.

The man, a recreational drone pilot, was convicted at the Manukau District Court on Thursday, and fined $1,000 for operating a drone in a manner that cause unnecessary endangerment, and failing to give way and keep clear of a manned aircraft.

He is the first to be convinced in New Zealand for a crash between a drone and a manned aircraft.

PROMOTED CONTENT

Dean Winter, the deputy chief executive of aviation safety at the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, said it was extremely lucky that the paraglider was not killed or seriously injured in the crash.

He added that he hopes Thursday’s conviction of the drone pilot will encourage other drone users to rigorously follow CAA drone rules, which specify that pilots must keep their drone within sight, and land immediately when manned aircraft are nearby.

“This conviction shows there can be real consequences when drone users fail to follow the rules and put the lives of others at risk through their lack of understanding or carelessness,” Winter said.

“Although the pilot of the paraglider was able to safely walk away after the collision, the accident was deceptively dangerous and it was only down to sheer luck and the skill of the paraglider that there wasn’t a death that day.”

The drone pilot’s conviction and fine followed a judge-alone trial, where Judge Mina Wharepouri found the man guilty of the laid charges.

The drone pilot, who purchased his drone in 2016, reportedly told the court that he was not aware that Karioitahi Beach was popular with paragliders.

The man did admit that he saw a paraglider fly past him while he was at the beach, though argued that his action on the day of the accident were without fault.

However, Judge Wharepouri stated that the man should have immediately landed his drone when he became aware of the paragliders, and appreciated that this drone “might pose a hazard to others in the air sharing the same airspace”.

The judge also stated that the man was not following CAA guidelines, and was overly reliant on tracking the drone via its screen, rather than keeping the drone within his direct line of sight.

25% off starts now! Australian Aviation magazine Cyber Monday sale is now live. Have the very best of Australian Aviation’s annual print and digital subscription. This includes every In Focus and Behind the Lens digital magazine, special coverage, exclusive photos and editions you may have miss. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

5 Comments

  • Karl Valentin

    says:

    $1,000 for nearly killing someone. He got off lightly.

    • Andy M Ronayne

      says:

      I agree entirely- $1k is hardly a deterrent.

      • Ron

        says:

        At least $100,000 would be a start as a deterrent IMHO.
        Psychologically interesting that it’s the morons’ of the world who have the funds to pay for life-threatening ‘toys’.

  • Tim

    says:

    Drones’ are being operated by idiots’ who are selfish, & have no regards for others’.
    The paraglider in this case was just very lucky he wasn’t killed.
    Governments’ should set up particular areas’ where drones can be used, or risk a person being killed, or an aircraft being downed.

  • Dennis

    says:

    In Sydney we have a huge problem that has been reported but not yet acted on. The maps that most drone users seem to use does not have the Victor One lane off the coast of Sydney shown at all. Drone pilots are taking pictures over areas like Cronulla in complete ignorance to the fact that light aircraft transit the area at 500 feet. I have seen images posted on Facebook that were taken higher than 500 feet. It is only a matter of time before a drone goes through the windscreen of a light aircraft in Victor One laneway.

Leave a Comment to Tim Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year