australian aviation logo

Regulator knocks back proposed Cathay Pacific, Qantas codeshare

written by australianaviation.com.au | July 23, 2019

A pair of Airbus A330s from Cathay Pacific and Qantas at Sydney Airport. (Rob Finlayson)
A pair of Airbus A330s from Cathay Pacific and Qantas at Sydney Airport. (Rob Finlayson)

Qantas says it is disappointed at being denied the opportunity to forge a deeper partnership with Cathay Pacific.

Australia’s International Air Services Commission (IASC) said on Tuesday it had rejected Qantas’s application for Cathay Pacific to add its CX airline code on 35 flights a week between Australia and Hong Kong.

The final ruling followed the IASC’s draft decision to knock back the application in May.

“We’re disappointed with the decision to reject our application to expand our codeshare with Cathay Pacific,” Qantas said in a statement to Australian Aviation on Tuesday.

“We are reviewing the decision and are considering our next steps.”


In early 2019, Qantas sought regulatory approval for Cathay Pacific to add its CX airline code on 35 Qantas-operated flights a week across three routes – Brisbane-Hong Kong, Melbourne-Hong Kong an Sydney-Hong Kong.

The codeshare flights on these routes would only be sold as part of a through journey involving connections either beyond Hong Kong on Cathay Pacific or its regional wing Cathay Dragon to destinations in India, Sri Lanka and Vietnam, among other countries, or to other Australian domestic destinations from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney on Qantas.

Qantas also planned to add its QF airline code on 35 Cathay Pacific-operated flights a week from the same three Australian cities and Hong Kong. However, this did not require regulatory approval.

The proposed codeshare flights are shown in bold in the table below:

Flight Number/Routing
Qantas flights
Cathay Pacific flights

Brisbane-Hong Kong

QF97 10:10–17:25

CX156 00:55 – 07:30
CX146 11:15 – 20:25 (3,4,6,7)

Hong Kong-Brisbane

QF98 20:15 – 07:00+1

CX157 13:10 – 23:35
CX147 21:20 – 09:55+1 (2,3,5,6)

Melbourne-Hong Kong

QF29 09:40 – 17:20

CX134 07:30 – 15:05
CX104 14:20 – 21:50
CX178 23:45 – 07:05+1

Hong Kong-Melbourne

QF30 20:10 – 07:35+1

CX105 00:10 – 11:10
CX163 11:05 – 22:05
CX135 19:05 – 06:10+1

Sydney-Hong Kong

QF127 10:20 – 18:00
QF117 21:20 – 05:00+1

CX110 07:35 – 15:20
CX162 10:15 – 17:55
CX100 14:15 – 21:35
CX138 21:55 – 05:15+1

Hong Kong-Sydney

QF128 19:30 – 06:55+1
QF118 22:35 – 10:00+1

CX139 09:10 – 20:20
CX111 18:50 – 06:15+1
CX161 21:30 – 08:50+1
CX101 23:55 – 10:50+1

Source: Qantas

The proposed codeshare would have expanded an existing arrangement that has been in place since late 2018, where Qantas added its QF airline code on selected Cathay Pacific/Cathay Dragon flights out of Hong Kong – as well as on Perth-Hong Kong and Cairns-Hong Kong, and Cathay Pacific added its CX airline code on selected Qantas Australian domestic flights.

“The codeshare has already delivered great benefits for our customers and expanding it would create even more options for travellers and improve opportunities for frequent flyers,” Qantas said.

While Qantas described the proposed codeshare as “a pro-competitive expansion of each carrier’s ability to sell and market itineraries” that was focused on attracting connecting passengers, the IASC disagreed.

The IASC final decision said the proposed codeshare “would entrench the dominant positions of Qantas and Cathay Pacific as the two largest airlines offering direct services on the route” and weaken the competitive position of Virgin Australia, the only other carrier offering nonstop flights between Australia and Hong Kong.

“The commission considers that this further entrenched position is likely to impair other carriers’ ability to enter into and offer commercially sustainable services on the route,” the IASC final ruling said.

“The public interest is best served by having a healthy number of competing carriers on the route, each with a sustainable level of capacity.”

Virgin Australia, which strongly opposed the proposed codeshare in its submissions to the IASC, welcomed the final decision.

The airline said the ruling would ensure there would be no distortion in the competitive landscape on the Australia-Hong Kong route.

“The proposed codeshare would have constrained the ability for other players to effectively compete on this route, which would have had a negative flow-on effect for our customers, as well as impacting tourism and trade,” Virgin Australia said in a statement to Australian Aviation on Tuesday.

“Hong Kong remains an important part of our international network and we will continue to offer an exceptional product and service for the travelling public.”

A summary of the frequency, capacity and passenger share on the Australia-Hong Kong market from the IASC draft decision. (IASC)
A summary of the frequency, capacity and passenger share on the Australia-Hong Kong market from the IASC draft decision. (IASC)

Cathay Pacific, Qantas and Virgin Australia the only three airlines with nonstop Australia-Hong Kong flights

Currently, Cathay Pacific serves six destinations in Australia – Adelaide, Brisbane, Cairns, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney – from its Hong Kong hub with a mix of Airbus A330-300s, A350-900s and Boeing 777-300ERs offering business, premium economy and economy. This does not include freighter services. Cairns flights are ending in October.

It planned to use the A350-1000 to Melbourne and Perth from October.

Cathay Pacific is the only Hong Kong-based carrier offering nonstop flights to Australia, after Virgin Australia alliance partner Hong Kong Airlines withdrew its flights to Cairns and the Gold Coast in October 2018.

Qantas offers nonstop flights from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney to Hong Kong with a mix of Airbus A330s, A380s and Boeing 747s and 787-9s.

Virgin Australia started serving the Special Administrative Region (SAR) with its own aircraft in July 2017, when it began nonstop flights on the Melbourne-Hong Kong route with two-class Airbus A330-200s.

It added daily Sydney-Hong Kong services, again with A330-200 equipment, in July 2018.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (5)

  • Mark


    So is QF still going to proceed with adding their code to CX operated flights given it doesn’t require regulatory approval?

  • Luke


    IASC decision is not taking in account the fact othe travel isn’t point to point ie SYD HKG it’s SYD to DEL via HKG for example as a through fare no stopover allowed in HKG. So therefore it’s not distraughting traffic from Virgin. What’s interesting is that VA and VS can codeshare via HKG with stopover in HKG and that VA can codeshare with Hong Kong express

    • Carla


      Actually VA can’t stopover in HKG on the codeshare under the bilateral. VS can.

  • Martin I Clementson


    Why would you fly in an outdated A330-200? CX and QF offer modern aircraft and plenty of choice.

  • Scott


    9 across Econ in 787 & 4 across suites in J,
    Or 8 across Econ in 330 & 4 across suites in J, once inside the cabin that’s all pax care about, so the 330 has same / more Room than 787, slightly less in J compared to the 350 and no difference in Econ (9 across)
    I’ve flown to Asia over last 3 months on 350, 787, 777 (10 across) and 330 and inside the cabin there is no dramatic difference at all m.
    I think the right decision has been made, 93% market share need no mutual cooperation.

Comments are closed.

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.