australian aviation logo

Australian High Court backs ACCC in cargo cartel

written by australianaviation.com.au | June 14, 2017

An Garuda Indonesia Airbus A330-300 takes off. (Airbus)
The High Court has unanimously dismissed appeals from from Air New Zealand and Garuda Indonesia.

Australia’s High Court has handed the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) a victory in its long-running case against a number of airlines on price fixing on certain air freight charges.

In a judgement handed down on Wednesday, the High Court unanimously dismissed two appeals from a decision of the full court of the Federal Court of Australia from Air New Zealand and PT Garuda Indonesia.

“The principal issue on appeal was whether there was a market ‘in Australia’ for the air cargo services for which the airlines competed for the purposes of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth),” the High Court said in a statement.

“The High Court held that the findings of fact made by the primary judge led to the conclusion that there was such a market.”

ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said it was a significant win for the ACCC in the long-running, highly contested air cargo cartel proceedings that concerned price fixing agreements entered into between Air New Zealand, Garuda and other international airlines between 2002 and 2006 that breached Australian competition laws.


The ACCC alleged Air New Zealand in 2009 and Garuda in 2010 colluded with other airlines on charges for fuel, security, insurance surcharges, and a customs fee, for the carriage of air freight from origin ports in Hong Kong (both airlines), Singapore (Air NZ) and Indonesia (Garuda) to destination ports in Australia.

Under the Trade Practices Act as it then stood, the ACCC was required to establish that the conduct occurred in a “market in Australia”.

The Federal Court initially found that the market for the air cargo services for which the airlines competed was not in Australia.

However the ACCC appealed to the full court of the Federal Court. And the airlines then sought leave to appeal to the High Court.

“How a market is defined, including considerations of whether conduct occurs in Australia, are critical issues to the understanding and interpretation of Australian competition law,” ACCC commissioner Court said in a statement.

“Today’s judgment sends a clear message that the ACCC is committed to pursuing cartel conduct that impacts on Australian business and consumers.

The ACCC said matters against Air New Zealand and Garuda would be “remitted to the Federal Court for a hearing as to relief, including penalty”.

The ACCC commenced court proceedings against 15 international airlines between 2008 and 2010. So far, 13 airlines have been fined a total of $98.5 million.

Date of Court Order



December 2008



British Airways 

December 2008



Air France and KLM 

February 2009




February 2009




February 2009



Japan Airlines 

April 2011



Korean Air Lines

November 2011



Malaysia Airlines

May 2012




October 2012



Cathay Pacific

December 2012




December 2012



Thai Airways 

December 2012


Source: ACCC

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (4)

  • James


    Where has this $98.5 million gone? I understand that it is not all in one go, but that is a heck of an amount of $$$ paid to whom? I’m sure it could have paid for a few things around…..

  • Peter


    Paid as a fine to the Commonwealth, James, as all commonwealth penalties the money is remitted to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

  • Paul


    James; Peter Dutton has just spent most of it on lawyers and compensation payouts.

  • Despite being classified as dangerous goods, freight of this kind can also be transported by air, benefitting from its speed, although it does require a series of specialised procedures to guarantee that the logistics operation proceeds with no unwanted surprises.

Comments are closed.

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.