Close sidebar

F-35 JSF re-certification no surprise

written by australianaviation.com.au | June 7, 2010
photo - JSF PO

That the troubled JSF program has been re-certified after its April Nunn-McCurdy breach is no surprise, especially after many of the issues which saw it breach the threshold were substantially addressed by US SECDEF Gates back in February.

It’s interesting though to observe the disparity between the program cost estimates of the various ‘independent’ bodies reporting in to the Pentagon such as the GAO, JET, SAR and other acronym-rich entities which are predicting unit costs of US$112m or more, and those of Lockheed Martin which says it has consistently come in 20 per cent or more under such estimates on development and LRIP contracts signed to date, and will do the same in the impending LRIP 4 agreement.

There’s no doubt that ongoing production difficulties and delays to the flight test program and the forecast cost increases have tainted the JSF program, adding weight to those arguments that the aircraft itself will not be sufficiently capable against developing Russian and Chinese airborne and anti-air threats such as the Su-35, PAK-FA and S300/400.

Advertisement
Advertisement

But it’s also difficult to get past the fact that those in the know, from the RAAF’s Chief of Air Force down, are genuinely excited by the F-35’s potential. They say that what’s inside the ‘magic bag of tricks’, despite it being mostly theoretical at this stage, is game changing and will be more than sufficient.

Steer your own in-flight experience – available on print and digital Whether our classic glossy magazine in your letterbox, daily news updates in your inbox, peeling back a few layers in the podcast or our monthly current affair reports, you can count on us to keep you up to date. Sign up today for just $99.95 for more exclusive offers here. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

3 Comments

  • KGM

    says:

    Any idea what kinds of things would be in the bag of tricks?

  • AD

    says:

    No matter what, certain people will continue to claim that the F-35 is utterly unsuitable for any form of modern air combat. It’s truly mind-boggling that these people also demand specifications of classified componentry, and then cry that any reticence to provide this information is symptomatic of a cover-up.

  • Andrew McLaughlin

    says:

    KGM – I’ve got an idea but I don’t know for sure. Obviously things like the aircraft’s low observable characteristics, AESA, EOTS, DAS, datalinks and the whole sensor fusion thing would be major parts of the equation.

    AD – I tend to agree. The classification levels surrounding this program are a whole new world for the ADF and many other partner nations, so they’re always going to play their cards very close to their chests.

    Cheers

    Andrew

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

F-35 JSF re-certification no surprise

written by australianaviation.com.au | June 7, 2010
photo - JSF PO

That the troubled JSF program has been re-certified after its April Nunn-McCurdy breach is no surprise, especially after many of the issues which saw it breach the threshold were substantially addressed by US SECDEF Gates back in February.

It’s interesting though to observe the disparity between the program cost estimates of the various ‘independent’ bodies reporting in to the Pentagon such as the GAO, JET, SAR and other acronym-rich entities which are predicting unit costs of US$112m or more, and those of Lockheed Martin which says it has consistently come in 20 per cent or more under such estimates on development and LRIP contracts signed to date, and will do the same in the impending LRIP 4 agreement.

There’s no doubt that ongoing production difficulties and delays to the flight test program and the forecast cost increases have tainted the JSF program, adding weight to those arguments that the aircraft itself will not be sufficiently capable against developing Russian and Chinese airborne and anti-air threats such as the Su-35, PAK-FA and S300/400.

Advertisement
Advertisement

But it’s also difficult to get past the fact that those in the know, from the RAAF’s Chief of Air Force down, are genuinely excited by the F-35’s potential. They say that what’s inside the ‘magic bag of tricks’, despite it being mostly theoretical at this stage, is game changing and will be more than sufficient.

Steer your own in-flight experience – available on print and digital Whether our classic glossy magazine in your letterbox, daily news updates in your inbox, peeling back a few layers in the podcast or our monthly current affair reports, you can count on us to keep you up to date. Sign up today for just $99.95 for more exclusive offers here. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

3 Comments

  • KGM

    says:

    Any idea what kinds of things would be in the bag of tricks?

  • AD

    says:

    No matter what, certain people will continue to claim that the F-35 is utterly unsuitable for any form of modern air combat. It’s truly mind-boggling that these people also demand specifications of classified componentry, and then cry that any reticence to provide this information is symptomatic of a cover-up.

  • Andrew McLaughlin

    says:

    KGM – I’ve got an idea but I don’t know for sure. Obviously things like the aircraft’s low observable characteristics, AESA, EOTS, DAS, datalinks and the whole sensor fusion thing would be major parts of the equation.

    AD – I tend to agree. The classification levels surrounding this program are a whole new world for the ADF and many other partner nations, so they’re always going to play their cards very close to their chests.

    Cheers

    Andrew

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year