The hole left in the fuselage of Alaska Airlines' 737 MAX 9, N704AL, after its door plug blew out in January 2024. (Image: NTSB)

Can Boeing save its reputation after another MAX incident?

Once occupying a lofty perch as the biggest commercial planemaker in the world, the aviation giant has seen its reputation plummet again in the wake of yet another 737 MAX fiasco. Jake Nelson examines how the company might pull out of its tailspin.

Possibly no company in aviation has had a more calamitous fall from grace in recent years than Boeing. Once the most revered planemaker in the business with a rolled-gold reputation for safety and quality – “if it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going”, as the saying went – the saga of the 737 MAX has since trashed its public perception, with archrival Airbus overtaking it as the world’s biggest manufacturer of passenger aircraft amid a string of high-profile MAX safety incidents.

“[The MAX 8 and MAX 9 incidents] are a series of blows on Boeing’s reputation, which are the least that any businesses want to see or experience,” says Chrystal Zhang, associate professor of aerospace engineering and aviation at RMIT University, who has written several articles about the 737 MAX crisis.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

“For an aircraft manufacturer, these incidents are fatal in terms of damaging its reputation.”

‘Clowns supervised by monkeys’

Pushed out to compete with the Airbus A320neo family, the MAX line stemmed from a Boeing decision to update the 50-year-old 737 design rather than create a new plane from the ground up, saving time and money. Unfortunately, its first delivery of a MAX 8 in 2017 came just a year and a half before the first crash of a MAX 8, Lion Air flight 610 in October 2018 – which was followed after just a few short months by a second crash, Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 in March 2019. The two incidents – which were found to have been caused by faults in the MAX 8’s Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), with flawed sensor information repeatedly forcing the planes’ noses down – grounded the MAX worldwide for 20 months. Boeing was charged with fraud and fined $2.5 billion, with internal emails from Boeing pilots uncovered during the investigations describing the plane as being “designed by clowns, who in turn are supervised by monkeys”.

While MAX deliveries eventually resumed, they have been sluggish, with Virgin Australia only receiving its first long-delayed MAX 8 last year. It is still one of only two Australian airlines to use the MAX family (the other being Bonza), with Qantas Group – a long-time 737 customer, with 75 737-800s in its Qantas fleet – opting to jump ship to the A320neo and A220 lines instead. Though it seemed for a while like the situation might be turning around, Boeing’s problems with the MAX family compounded when, this January, 171 planes in the MAX 9 fleet were grounded after a door plug blew off Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 in mid-air. While the NTSB investigation is still ongoing at the time of writing, preliminary reports indicate that four key bolts were missing from the door plug, which had been removed to repair rivets damaged during production at notorious Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems.

Meanwhile, the smallest variant, the MAX 7, and the largest, the MAX 10, still have not received FAA approval – an issue for the MAX 10 in particular, which has a large backlog of orders including from Virgin Australia.

Winning back trust

What can be done to right the ship? According to Professor Zhang, the MAX debacle has created both short-term and long-term problems for Boeing. “In the short term, Boeing needs to address the trust crises from both aircraft operators and [travelling] public,” she says. “We know that it takes time to establish and nurture the brand but it takes a blink to destroy the brand. It would also affect its market value as reflected in the financial market. In the long term, Boeing needs to review its market positioning and determine its strategic goals and objectives. It needs to ensure it takes product quality and safe operation as a priority. Boeing might continue losing market share compared with its rivals. Unless it acts, its market share will continue to fall.”

While the company has more than a century of history manufacturing both passenger and cargo aircraft for carriers around the world, Professor Zhang warns that this goodwill is not infinite. “[Boeing] has a legacy of having successfully weathered through the ups and downs and still takes almost half of the market share in the major commercial aircraft market,” she says. “The 737 series is one of the most popular aircraft, loved by airlines and travellers. The 747, although it is phasing out of the market, revolutionised global air travel, making long-haul more accessible and affordable. However, this does not mean that Boeing can sit on its complacency. Technological advancement is unprecedented, competition is fiercer, the geopolitical landscape is more dynamic, and the global air travel market is changing.”

Ultimately, Professor Zhang says Boeing needs to reflect on its vision and “make a hard decision” on its strategic goals and priorities, and decide what its fundamental objective is: profits, cost-cutting, or engineering excellence.

“Getting the balance right is challenging, but it is time for Boeing to have a pause, reflect, make a choice and then take action.”

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA