Opinion: Airmanship, Risk vs Reward
‘Airmanship’ can be difficult to define practically. The best conceptual definition I have come across is from Dr Tony Kern in Redefining Airmanship: “the consistent use of good judgement and well-developed skills to accomplish flight objectives.” Simple, but not readily demonstrable through pilot training or operations. In asking other aviators, many could not readily recall a discrete example of their own good or bad airmanship. The following is my recollection of what I believe to be an illustration of airmanship, albeit one that is open to discussion given I achieved safety at the expense of an operational objective.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.