Qantas is telling firms not to hire its ex-workers, claims TWU

written by Adam Thorn | April 12, 2021
TWU Michael Kaine 1
The TWU’s national secretary, Michael Kaine

The TWU has publicly accused Qantas of telling ground handling companies not to hire its redundant workers.

Qantas said in response that it “completely rejects” the claims and has actively attempted to facilitate introductions to help its former staff.

The union made the statement hours before it begins a landmark Federal Court case where it will attempt to force the airline to rehire more than 2,000 employees whose roles were outsourced earlier this year.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Both Qantas and Jetstar removed ground handling operations this year at the Australian airports where the work was done in-house, which included Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, shifting them to businesses including Swissport and dnata.

Speaking outside the Federal Court in Sydney this morning, TWU national secretary Michael Kaine accused the airline of sabotaging redundant employees’ chances of finding work at the companies that won the contracts.

“We’re getting an increasing number of stories coming through to us from workers who have applied for work in these labour hire companies,” said Kaine. “And it seems to us that there’s a reasonable suspicion that Qantas has put the word out that these workers should not be employed.

“Why? Because these workers have been part of a collective workforce who have come together and done exactly what our laws asked them to do: together, sit down and negotiate sensible arrangements that have led to good, secure jobs.

PROMOTED CONTENT

“Now, these companies don’t want workers who had that capacity and that experience, because they know that the next time a contract comes up, Qantas is simply going to dictate the price that it wants to pay for that labour. And they won’t have any choice.”

In the Federal Court today, Waterfront dispute lawyer Josh Bornstein will argue Qantas decision to outsource ground handling workers contravenes the Fair Work Act because employees at the new companies will now no longer entitled to terms secured through enterprise agreements.

If successful, a potential ruling could have major ramifications for other businesses.

Qantas said in response, “We recognise that this was a difficult decision that impacted a lot of our people but outsourcing this work to specialist ground handlers who already do this work for us in other cities across the country is not unlawful.”

The airline has previously accused the TWU of not telling the truth. In particular, it has rejected accusations that it has transferred ground handling roles to “labour hire firms” and denied it has abused JobKeeper subsidies. It’s also hit back at the central claim that it removed in-house roles to avoid collective bargaining agreements.

The case has been controversial because Qantas forged ahead with outsourcing the roles before the outcome of today’s case. It said it was able to do this because the union didn’t obtain an ‘interlocutory injunction’.

Last year, Bornstein said he believed his case would put “outsourcing on trial”.

“If Qantas can replace thousands of its employees with cheaper, insecure labour hire employees then this can happen to any other employee in any Australian workplace,” said Bornstein.

“This important test case for the TWU will determine whether Qantas’ decision to sack 2,000 workers to outsource these jobs breaches workplace laws.

“The Fair Work Act makes clear that you can’t sack employees because they are entitled to collectively bargained employment conditions. By outsourcing this work, Qantas is seeking to avoid collective bargaining under the Fair Work Act.

“If the outsourcing proceeds, Qantas will no longer have to negotiate with the workers who perform the work. Instead, Qantas will be able to unilaterally impose a price for the services of outsourced workers, and those outsourced workers will not be allowed to bargain with Qantas under current IR laws.”

 

Did you know that Australian Aviation Magazine comes digitally? Subscribe to Australian Aviation’s digital magazine for just $59.95 a year! Our app is available on mobile, tablet and PC devices! Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

11 Comments

  • Trevor

    says:

    Typical TWU beat-up.

    QANTAS has got better things to do with its’ time currently, than try & ‘sabotage’ previous employees’ new job prospects.

    It’s NOT coincidental that TWU is saying this just before a Court case by them, against the airline.
    The TWU is the lowest of scum, & will do ANYTHING to make themselves look good, & denigrate the Company.
    They know they’ll probably lose this case as well, as the two they lost last September, against QANTAS.

  • Chris

    says:

    I would believe a thing the TWU says.

    • Blake

      says:

      Didn’t you mean ‘would not’?

  • Steve A

    says:

    If this turns out to be true, then the PM should demand the Board and all senior management scalps.
    This would be absolutely disgusting behaviour, particularly as the Australian taxpayer has been paying Qantas staff to sit around until AJ calls for them.

    • Lindsay

      says:

      QANTAS is a Private Company.
      What it does, or doesn’t do, has nothing to do with the PM.
      Your comment above is complete, & utter nonsense.

      Your continual long worded, negative verbiage, since March 2020, against the Company, means you’ve got some serious issues’ in your life somewhere.

      Give it a rest!
      Fed up with reading how ‘wonderful’ you think you are, & that you, single-handedly, can ‘right the wrongs’ of the Australian Aviation Industry! Pffft!

  • Is QANTAS saying they “rejected” the accusations the same as denying them?

    • TailCharlie

      says:

      The derivation of the word ‘rejects’ means ‘to throw back’, so in doing, that is denying.

  • Edgar Allenspach

    says:

    Swissport is fully Chinese owned.

    • Cameron

      says:

      On 22-12-2020, HNA sold Swissport to a group of foreign investment brokers’.
      It’s NO longer in Chinese hands!

  • Bill Weston

    says:

    Don’t you love how there is always a comment from the QF department of propaganda. Welcome to the discussion “Trevor”

    • Trevor

      says:

      Hey, Bill, it’s very ignorant of you to assume.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year