Close sidebar

Explained: How to apply for an international travel exemption

written by Staff reporter | September 2, 2020
A file image of a self-boarding gate. (SITA)
A file image of a self-boarding gate. (SITA)

In this cross-posting from The Conversation, University of Technology Sydney lecturer Anthea Vogl explores how the process of obtaining an exception to Australia’s international travel ban works. 

Australians are all too aware of the restrictions on interstate travel and on who can currently enter Australia.

But people may not realise there is also a ban on overseas travel for all Australian citizens and residents, subject to a limited number of exemptions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Since March, about one in three requests to leave the country have been granted. This comes amid reports of Australians facing huge hurdles to see sick and dying relatives overseas.

So, what’s going on? Who can actually leave Australia at the moment?

What is the ban?

The ban on leaving Australia was put in place by Health Minister Greg Hunt on 25 March, as an “emergency requirement” under the Biosecurity Act. It is the first time Australia has had such a ban, and it was made on the advice of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee.

The determination says plainly: “An Australian citizen or permanent resident … must not leave Australian territory as a passenger on an outgoing aircraft or vessel.”

PROMOTED CONTENT

The accompanying statement explains, “[This] is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to represent a severe and immediate threat to human health in Australia and across the globe.”

Is this legal?

The government legally made the determination under the Biosecurity Act, which gives the health minister power to put in place “any requirement” they believe is necessary to prevent or control the entry or spread of the virus into Australia.

International law recognises the right to leave any country, including your own, but there is no equivalent constitutional protection in Australia.

In other words, Australians don’t have a constitutional right to leave Australia.

Strict exit bans for citizens are generally associated with authoritarian states, like North Korea and the former USSR. But the Health Department has said the ban is needed because of the burden returning residents place on quarantine arrangements, the health system and testing regimes.

The government has also argued it is “impossible” to only ban travel to specific places, due to the fast-moving nature of the pandemic in different countries.

Who can leave Australia at the moment?

Anyone who isn’t a citizen or resident is allowed to leave Australia.

Some Australians are also still free to leave. This includes those who are “ordinarily resident in a country other than Australia”, airline and maritime crew, outbound freight workers, and essential workers at offshore facilities.

All other citizens and residents must have an exemption if they want to leave. They need to apply online (which is free) and then bring the approved exemption to the airport.

To be granted an exemption, you must have a “compelling reason” for needing to leave Australian territory, and your travel must fall into one of the following categories:

  • Compassionate or humanitarian grounds;
  • Part of the response to the COVID-19 outbreak;
  • Essential for the conduct of critical industries and business to receive urgent medical treatment unavailable in Australia;
  • Urgent and unavoidable personal business;
  • In the national interest.

Most applications to leave are not successful

Despite these exemptions, it is still difficult to get permission to leave. Only about one in three requests are being granted.

According to Border Force, between March and mid-August it received more than 104,000 requests to leave Australia. About 34,300 exemptions have been granted.

Exemption applications are assessed by Border Force and applicants are advised to apply at least two weeks but not more than three months before departure.

Border Force adds: “If you are travelling due to death or critical illness of a close family member, you can apply inside this timeframe and we will prioritise your application.”

However, timeframes haven’t been guaranteed and people have reported significant delays even in emergency situations. If a request is refused, an applicant can reapply.

Failing to comply with the ban is a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ prison, a $63,000 fine, or both.

Are Victorians especially banned?

There is nothing to exclude Victorians, currently under Stage 3 and 4 restrictions, from applying to leave Australia.

The Victorian government directs residents to federal government advice regarding overseas trips.

However, Victorians would also need to comply with or seek exemptions from state-based restrictions (including for travel to the airport, for example) where an exemption was granted.

What are the problems with the ban?

Usually when governments pass legislation, they provide definitions of key terms. However, no definitions for any exemptions are included in the travel ban determination, which was made by Hunt and not reviewed by parliament.

What exemptions like “urgent and unavoidable personal business” cover is unclear, to say the least (luxury yacht, anyone?).

There have been repeated stories of Australians having enormous difficulties getting permission to see family and loved ones overseas. Although recent reports suggest the process is becoming easier.

One woman reported difficulty meeting the “compassionate grounds” exemption because her dying step-parent was not in hospital, due to a choice to spend his last days at home. Another received three different responses to the same request.

Applicants must provide sufficient documentation, but it is also unclear what documents are required. People whose documents are not in English must have them officially translated as part of an application. Those in distressed or bereaved states must nonetheless gather complex documentary evidence, which may include death certificates, or proof of an event or relationship.

Due to this lack of clarity, some people are seeking the advice of migration agents to help them leave Australia.

This adds to the ever-growing costs of mobility during the pandemic, while creating the extraordinary circumstance where legal advice is needed to help residents and citizens depart their own country.

When will the ban end?

Australia’s complete travel ban has not been adopted in similar countries. In New Zealand, Canada and Britain, overseas travel is strongly advised against but not banned.

Other countries to have completely prohibited travel include Kazakhstan, Lithuania and Uzbekistan.

Australia’s ban will automatically cease when the “biosecurity emergency period” is declared over, unless revoked beforehand.

But while the current period runs until 17 September, it is likely to be extended. In June, Hunt warned borders will remained closed for a “very significant” amount of time.

Although he also described Australia as an “island sanctuary”, it’s unlikely the many people held on either side of its 

Anthea Vogl is a senior lecturer at the University of Technology Sydney.

25% off starts now! Australian Aviation magazine Cyber Monday sale is now live. Have the very best of Australian Aviation’s annual print and digital subscription. This includes every In Focus and Behind the Lens digital magazine, special coverage, exclusive photos and editions you may have miss. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

7 Comments

  • JP

    says:

    I guess this is a Police State…

  • John

    says:

    Unless you are a sportsman then you can leave Australia

  • Rob

    says:

    How wonderful- so we are in the same company as Kazakhstan, Lithuania and Uzbekistan, North Korea and the former USSR!!!!
    So we are also saying that Australia is unable to handle the burden that returning residents place on quarantine arrangements, the health system and testing regimes. That is pathetic…..no real pandemic plan, so we will shut down our economy, kill an airline or two etc etc.
    Should be simple to set some rules like “you go, but pay for your return quarantine before you go and by the way the Aust Govt will not rescue you if the need to return is associated with Covid”

  • Ken Fletcher

    says:

    okay agree with Rob, this is so wrong in many ways. yes sportspeople and the super elite are exempt, and we have gone backwards when we are in the same class as Korea, I just don’t understand why presumed healthy people can’t travel to a very low risk country, the government have allowed it’s fair share of sick tennis players in, there needs to be a nationwide class action to stop this incarceration on this so called island sanctuary, it’s a prison with no escape, and doing damage to people in the process, these are bad laws and as always money driven, everyone has to be treated equally despite these economic situation. everyone should fly not just the favoured ones

  • Stephen Cooper

    says:

    I am a 66 year old man and I do not expect to live forever. My wife and 3 kids are in the Philippines . My youngest son has Just turned 5 years old. I do not want him to grow up not having to have known me. The Philippine Government has open it boarders to people who have families in the Philippines. I lived in China for 17 years. People in China are freer than we are people in Australia. The pervious comment is correct. I am not a sportsmen so I get nothing.

  • Nasser

    says:

    I have some questions?
    How much has been spent so far on trying to protect the nation against COVID? Billions.
    How much was paid to individuals as the result of job seekers, and other things? Billions.
    How much was the damages to the economy as the results of governments (both the states and federal ) failure to manage the quarantines on time and in proper manner such as the method done by China? Billions so far and billions to come( Comparing China population and Australia in this respect too)

    Well when you think about all of the above, doesn’t this surprise you? Wasn’t any better way to control the spread of the virus? I think there was, but the way things were done was all too wrong.
    First: Hotel quarantine is the worse method and the biggest failure that the government and the nation experienced resulting to huge loss of money and preventable shutdown of the country.
    Alternative: Australia could have spent only a fraction of all the money lost so far for building huge single isolated studio or one or two bedrooms for families somewhere far from the cities in remote areas for travellers who were the causes of spreading the virus. This could have been done last year in March. By this not only a lot of jobs were created, but instead of giving away money to people for nothing, they would have ha to work for it.
    Problem with Hotel quarantine was the air conditioning and lack of proper isolation which lead to spread of virus.
    2: If the governments ( states and federal have build such dwelling we would not had to face the problem of 40,000 Australian stuck overseas. Besides all those dwelling would have been paid for by the people coming back in no time as well. Just think how much each of those units would have cost to build. Simple isolated dwellings with independent air systems that even if there was a virus it would have stayed in the remote area and could be then disinfected by chemical mean far from any city. There could have been people for services at sites that would never leave the area and will not come in contact with other service providers such as food deliveries and medicine in order to control the virus spread 100% and without fear.
    However unfortunately the governments instead of rescuing the economy and allowing travellers by this easy method, they have gone the worse way about it and still going on with it as Hotel quarantine in the major cities!!!
    Australia being so isolated, could have done a lot better that this. We have very little virus occasionally. Thanks to the government. But the cost of this has been far too high. If they had build a huge number of isolated dwelling we would have save a lot of lives as well as billions of dollars and wuld have had tourist coming and going too.

  • louise

    says:

    i have few words to say except we are in a complete mess, no insight as to how or when it will end, i havnt seen my partner for going on 15mths…for what….???? left everything behind because the government advised us to return home, well i really wish i had known the consequences of my decision back then…!!
    quarantine needs to be fixed, vaccinations need to be rolled out, we are a laughing stock compared to some of the third world countries out there…..!! truly, what are the government doing behind closed doors…??

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explained: How to apply for an international travel exemption

written by Staff reporter | September 2, 2020
A file image of a self-boarding gate. (SITA)
A file image of a self-boarding gate. (SITA)

In this cross-posting from The Conversation, University of Technology Sydney lecturer Anthea Vogl explores how the process of obtaining an exception to Australia’s international travel ban works. 

Australians are all too aware of the restrictions on interstate travel and on who can currently enter Australia.

But people may not realise there is also a ban on overseas travel for all Australian citizens and residents, subject to a limited number of exemptions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Since March, about one in three requests to leave the country have been granted. This comes amid reports of Australians facing huge hurdles to see sick and dying relatives overseas.

So, what’s going on? Who can actually leave Australia at the moment?

What is the ban?

The ban on leaving Australia was put in place by Health Minister Greg Hunt on 25 March, as an “emergency requirement” under the Biosecurity Act. It is the first time Australia has had such a ban, and it was made on the advice of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee.

The determination says plainly: “An Australian citizen or permanent resident … must not leave Australian territory as a passenger on an outgoing aircraft or vessel.”

PROMOTED CONTENT

The accompanying statement explains, “[This] is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to represent a severe and immediate threat to human health in Australia and across the globe.”

Is this legal?

The government legally made the determination under the Biosecurity Act, which gives the health minister power to put in place “any requirement” they believe is necessary to prevent or control the entry or spread of the virus into Australia.

International law recognises the right to leave any country, including your own, but there is no equivalent constitutional protection in Australia.

In other words, Australians don’t have a constitutional right to leave Australia.

Strict exit bans for citizens are generally associated with authoritarian states, like North Korea and the former USSR. But the Health Department has said the ban is needed because of the burden returning residents place on quarantine arrangements, the health system and testing regimes.

The government has also argued it is “impossible” to only ban travel to specific places, due to the fast-moving nature of the pandemic in different countries.

Who can leave Australia at the moment?

Anyone who isn’t a citizen or resident is allowed to leave Australia.

Some Australians are also still free to leave. This includes those who are “ordinarily resident in a country other than Australia”, airline and maritime crew, outbound freight workers, and essential workers at offshore facilities.

All other citizens and residents must have an exemption if they want to leave. They need to apply online (which is free) and then bring the approved exemption to the airport.

To be granted an exemption, you must have a “compelling reason” for needing to leave Australian territory, and your travel must fall into one of the following categories:

  • Compassionate or humanitarian grounds;
  • Part of the response to the COVID-19 outbreak;
  • Essential for the conduct of critical industries and business to receive urgent medical treatment unavailable in Australia;
  • Urgent and unavoidable personal business;
  • In the national interest.

Most applications to leave are not successful

Despite these exemptions, it is still difficult to get permission to leave. Only about one in three requests are being granted.

According to Border Force, between March and mid-August it received more than 104,000 requests to leave Australia. About 34,300 exemptions have been granted.

Exemption applications are assessed by Border Force and applicants are advised to apply at least two weeks but not more than three months before departure.

Border Force adds: “If you are travelling due to death or critical illness of a close family member, you can apply inside this timeframe and we will prioritise your application.”

However, timeframes haven’t been guaranteed and people have reported significant delays even in emergency situations. If a request is refused, an applicant can reapply.

Failing to comply with the ban is a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ prison, a $63,000 fine, or both.

Are Victorians especially banned?

There is nothing to exclude Victorians, currently under Stage 3 and 4 restrictions, from applying to leave Australia.

The Victorian government directs residents to federal government advice regarding overseas trips.

However, Victorians would also need to comply with or seek exemptions from state-based restrictions (including for travel to the airport, for example) where an exemption was granted.

What are the problems with the ban?

Usually when governments pass legislation, they provide definitions of key terms. However, no definitions for any exemptions are included in the travel ban determination, which was made by Hunt and not reviewed by parliament.

What exemptions like “urgent and unavoidable personal business” cover is unclear, to say the least (luxury yacht, anyone?).

There have been repeated stories of Australians having enormous difficulties getting permission to see family and loved ones overseas. Although recent reports suggest the process is becoming easier.

One woman reported difficulty meeting the “compassionate grounds” exemption because her dying step-parent was not in hospital, due to a choice to spend his last days at home. Another received three different responses to the same request.

Applicants must provide sufficient documentation, but it is also unclear what documents are required. People whose documents are not in English must have them officially translated as part of an application. Those in distressed or bereaved states must nonetheless gather complex documentary evidence, which may include death certificates, or proof of an event or relationship.

Due to this lack of clarity, some people are seeking the advice of migration agents to help them leave Australia.

This adds to the ever-growing costs of mobility during the pandemic, while creating the extraordinary circumstance where legal advice is needed to help residents and citizens depart their own country.

When will the ban end?

Australia’s complete travel ban has not been adopted in similar countries. In New Zealand, Canada and Britain, overseas travel is strongly advised against but not banned.

Other countries to have completely prohibited travel include Kazakhstan, Lithuania and Uzbekistan.

Australia’s ban will automatically cease when the “biosecurity emergency period” is declared over, unless revoked beforehand.

But while the current period runs until 17 September, it is likely to be extended. In June, Hunt warned borders will remained closed for a “very significant” amount of time.

Although he also described Australia as an “island sanctuary”, it’s unlikely the many people held on either side of its 

Anthea Vogl is a senior lecturer at the University of Technology Sydney.

25% off starts now! Australian Aviation magazine Cyber Monday sale is now live. Have the very best of Australian Aviation’s annual print and digital subscription. This includes every In Focus and Behind the Lens digital magazine, special coverage, exclusive photos and editions you may have miss. Subscribe now at australianaviation.com.au.

7 Comments

  • JP

    says:

    I guess this is a Police State…

  • John

    says:

    Unless you are a sportsman then you can leave Australia

  • Rob

    says:

    How wonderful- so we are in the same company as Kazakhstan, Lithuania and Uzbekistan, North Korea and the former USSR!!!!
    So we are also saying that Australia is unable to handle the burden that returning residents place on quarantine arrangements, the health system and testing regimes. That is pathetic…..no real pandemic plan, so we will shut down our economy, kill an airline or two etc etc.
    Should be simple to set some rules like “you go, but pay for your return quarantine before you go and by the way the Aust Govt will not rescue you if the need to return is associated with Covid”

  • Ken Fletcher

    says:

    okay agree with Rob, this is so wrong in many ways. yes sportspeople and the super elite are exempt, and we have gone backwards when we are in the same class as Korea, I just don’t understand why presumed healthy people can’t travel to a very low risk country, the government have allowed it’s fair share of sick tennis players in, there needs to be a nationwide class action to stop this incarceration on this so called island sanctuary, it’s a prison with no escape, and doing damage to people in the process, these are bad laws and as always money driven, everyone has to be treated equally despite these economic situation. everyone should fly not just the favoured ones

  • Stephen Cooper

    says:

    I am a 66 year old man and I do not expect to live forever. My wife and 3 kids are in the Philippines . My youngest son has Just turned 5 years old. I do not want him to grow up not having to have known me. The Philippine Government has open it boarders to people who have families in the Philippines. I lived in China for 17 years. People in China are freer than we are people in Australia. The pervious comment is correct. I am not a sportsmen so I get nothing.

  • Nasser

    says:

    I have some questions?
    How much has been spent so far on trying to protect the nation against COVID? Billions.
    How much was paid to individuals as the result of job seekers, and other things? Billions.
    How much was the damages to the economy as the results of governments (both the states and federal ) failure to manage the quarantines on time and in proper manner such as the method done by China? Billions so far and billions to come( Comparing China population and Australia in this respect too)

    Well when you think about all of the above, doesn’t this surprise you? Wasn’t any better way to control the spread of the virus? I think there was, but the way things were done was all too wrong.
    First: Hotel quarantine is the worse method and the biggest failure that the government and the nation experienced resulting to huge loss of money and preventable shutdown of the country.
    Alternative: Australia could have spent only a fraction of all the money lost so far for building huge single isolated studio or one or two bedrooms for families somewhere far from the cities in remote areas for travellers who were the causes of spreading the virus. This could have been done last year in March. By this not only a lot of jobs were created, but instead of giving away money to people for nothing, they would have ha to work for it.
    Problem with Hotel quarantine was the air conditioning and lack of proper isolation which lead to spread of virus.
    2: If the governments ( states and federal have build such dwelling we would not had to face the problem of 40,000 Australian stuck overseas. Besides all those dwelling would have been paid for by the people coming back in no time as well. Just think how much each of those units would have cost to build. Simple isolated dwellings with independent air systems that even if there was a virus it would have stayed in the remote area and could be then disinfected by chemical mean far from any city. There could have been people for services at sites that would never leave the area and will not come in contact with other service providers such as food deliveries and medicine in order to control the virus spread 100% and without fear.
    However unfortunately the governments instead of rescuing the economy and allowing travellers by this easy method, they have gone the worse way about it and still going on with it as Hotel quarantine in the major cities!!!
    Australia being so isolated, could have done a lot better that this. We have very little virus occasionally. Thanks to the government. But the cost of this has been far too high. If they had build a huge number of isolated dwelling we would have save a lot of lives as well as billions of dollars and wuld have had tourist coming and going too.

  • louise

    says:

    i have few words to say except we are in a complete mess, no insight as to how or when it will end, i havnt seen my partner for going on 15mths…for what….???? left everything behind because the government advised us to return home, well i really wish i had known the consequences of my decision back then…!!
    quarantine needs to be fixed, vaccinations need to be rolled out, we are a laughing stock compared to some of the third world countries out there…..!! truly, what are the government doing behind closed doors…??

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year