![](https://res.cloudinary.com/momentum-media-group-pty-ltd/images/w_2000,h_2285/f_auto,q_auto:best/v1684901214/Australian%20Aviation/5e9fef9e5694aa8b331c5246dcff1c79_jotrjz/5e9fef9e5694aa8b331c5246dcff1c79_jotrjz.jpg?_i=AA)
The 737 NG aircraft feature “chipmunk” engine nacelles, designed to maximise ground clearance on the 737. ROB FINLAYSON
What is MCAS?
And why is Boeing’s Maneuvring Characteristics Augmentation System a problem?
Boeing had a problem with the 737 MAX, and it was not a new problem. Rather, it was one of several awkward characteristics that dogged the manufacturer since the 1960s, when the 737 originally entered service, and which has confronted engineers working on revised generations of the aircraft for some fifty years: the aircraft is too low to the ground for modern engines.
The 737 was designed to have steps fold down from the aircraft for easy boarding and disembarkation — no costly jet bridges required here — and for easy ground loading and servicing of the aircraft.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Subscribe to Australian Aviation for unlimited access to exclusive content and past magazines.A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin