Australia’s new CAO 48.1 fatigue rules are far more restrictive than those in place in Europe, the US and New Zealand. rob finlayson

Getting tired of it

Time to fix CAO 48.1

It is time CASA settled the fatigue risk management system (FRMS) debate once and for all. The current regulations embodied in CAO 48. 1 must be put on hold and CASA needs to carry out a comprehensive review of the new regulations. This should include a comparison with current fatigue risk management rules in overseas jurisdictions such as those in the US, Europe and New Zealand. The fatigue rules in 48. 1 pertaining to regional aviation are far more restrictive than in these countries and CASA has not provided any valid justification for such an unnecessary impost on the regional aviation industry.

The review must not be conducted on the CASA premise that fatigue is an unmitigated risk in the industry and simply examine whether or not CAO 48. 1 will fix ‘the fatigue issue’. It must examine whether or not there is any empirical evidence that justifies the new CAO 48. 1 rule set. It is ironic that Australian regional operators are faced with the most restrictive and costly rules in the world and yet operate in a far, far less fatigue-inducing environment than that of the US or in Europe.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

Everyone agrees that fatigue is a hazard that needs managing.

Everyone agrees that long-haul operations need a comprehensive FRMS.

Everyone who is actually working in the industry and operating in a prudent and safe manner understands the requirements and application of CAO 48. 0 plus the Standard Industry Exemptions.

Everyone (including the ATSB) who takes an objective view of the status quo agrees there are no unmitigated fatigue issues in regional Australian regular public transport operations.

CASA has yet to supply the RAAA with a substantive supporting safety case in spite of three Freedom Of Information requests. Neither has CASA ever expended any effort to investigate the ‘state of the nation’ and actually sit down with operators and their safety management systems (SMS) and obtain the real data. CASA claims they simply do not have the resources to do that.

The wonderfully feel-good written communications from CASA very recently talks about collaboration, consultation, being a fair regulator, just culture, etc. This is at complete odds with what is actually happening.

As for any ICAO-compliant red herring argument, don’t be distracted. We can easily establish that the status quo of SMS, 48. 0 and the Standard Industry Exemptions are ICAO‑compliant.

The industry would welcome an independent review, but not simply of the efficacy of CAO 48. 1 to manage fatigue. That is not our argument, never has been and never will be.

Any review needs to start right back at the beginning and establish if there is in fact an unmitigated risk that needs addressing.

We need a truly independent risk analysis to determine if there is in fact an unmitigated problem in the first place. We believe it would be best conducted by an overseas expert as we doubt there are any independent reviewers available in Australia. They all have a vested interest in the prosecution of CAO 48. 1 as they stand to make significant windfalls from drafting a myriad of FRM systems. Any review should be well funded as just going to tender may result in the lowest cost option and it will be a case of you get what you pay for, with the outcome not being supported by the industry.

The RAAA wishes CASA would listen to the industry, accept reality and announce a moratorium on the commencement date of CAO 48. 1. That way we can all take a step back from the brink, stop the public stoushes and take a more professional and cool‑headed approach.

CASA got itself into this embarrassing position by assuming there is a problem and concocted CAO 48. 1.

There are no unmitigated fatigue issues in Australian regional RPT operations.

 

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA