Close sidebar

Moody’s places Virgin Australia on review for credit downgrade

written by | April 5, 2016
Moody’s says Virgin Australia is on review for a ratings downgrade. (Rob Finlayson)

Moody’s has placed Virgin Australia in line for a potential credit rating downgrade due to its balance sheet profile and major shareholder Air New Zealand’s move to potentially offload all or part of its 26 per cent stake in the Australian carrier.

“The review for downgrade reflects Moody’s view of the uncertainty which has emerged over the outcome of Virgin Australia’s capital structure review and the level of shareholder support,” Moody’s vice president and senior analyst Ian Chitterer said in a statement on Monday.

“The review also reflects the slower-than-expected momentum now evident in the deleveraging of the business and the deterioration in its liquidity profile, as reported for July-December 2015.”


On March 30, Air NZ said it was “exploring options with respect to its shareholding” in Virgin, with First NZ Capital and Credit Suisse advising the company in this matter.

Air NZ chairman Tony Carter said his airline’s review of its financial investment in Virgin would look at “possible alternate uses of capital currently deployed in Virgin Australia”, adding the carrier did not want a large minority equity position in Virgin as it focused on its own growth opportunities.

The move came a week after Air NZ and Virgin’s three other major shareholders – Etihad Airways, Singapore Airlines (SIA) and Sir Richard Branson’s UK-based Virgin Group – agreed to provide Virgin a $A425 million 12-month loan to boost its balance sheet while the airline group conducted a capital review.

Moody’s said it believed the Air NZ decision to potentially sell its investment in Virgin “creates uncertainty around the future ownership structure”.


“This may impact shareholder support,” Moody’s said.

“Virgin Australia’s strong shareholder base and its willingness to offer financial support in challenging times have historically provided additional support to the airline’s ratings and increased Moody’s rating tolerance for its current weak credit metrics.

“During the review, Moody’s will look for more clarity around the future of the shareholder base and support.”

Moody’s noted Virgin’s adjusted debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for the 12 months ended December31 2015 was 7.2 times, which exceeded Moody’s tolerance of 6.5 times for its B2 corporate family rating.

Virgin has a B2 corporate rating from Moody’s, which is below investment grade. The airline group’s senior unsecured debt is rated at B3, which is also below investment grade.

The Moody’s review of Virgin’s credit ratings comes on top of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) announcement on March 31 it had revised its outlook for the airline to negative, from stable, citing similar reasons to Moody’s.

“The outlook revision to negative reflects a degree of uncertainty over Virgin Australia’s near-term funding requirements and future ownership structure,” S&P analyst Graeme Ferguson said in a statement.

“We could lower the rating if we assess shareholder support to have diminished, or if the group fails to strengthen its liquidity position over the next three-to-six months.”

S&P described Virgin’s operating performance as “fundamentally sound”.

However, it said adverse currency and working capital movements, as well as increased capital expenditure relative to what it had previously forecast, to affect the airline’s current debt and liquidity levels.

“This may require a sizable new funding commitment over the next 12 months. We view shareholder support as the most reliable source of funding as prevailing credit market conditions may render bank or debt capital markets issuance unfeasible,” S&P said.

“In our opinion, without ongoing and timely shareholder support, Virgin Australia would not be able to absorb low-probability adverse events, even after factoring in capital-spending cuts, asset sales, and cuts in shareholder distributions.”

S&P also has Virgin at below investment grade with a B+ corporate credit rating.

Virgin Australia chief executive John Borghetti said the company had undertaken the “biggest airline transformation anyone has ever done in a short period of time” as it moved away from its Virgin Blue roots to a diversified airline group that included full-service, low-cost, regional, cargo and fly-in, fly-out businesses.

“Couple that with an enormous capacity war you have to fight there comes a time when you get over those two things and you have to strengthen the business and go forward,” Borghetti told the Australian Financial Review on April 2.

“It’s really now focusing on the capital structure and the efficiency of the business through reductions in sustainable costs such as simplification of the fleet and other business.”

Virgin Australia chief executive John Borghetti presenting the 2015/16 first half results. (Jordan Chong)
Virgin Australia chief executive John Borghetti. (Jordan Chong)

Borghetti, who took over as Virgin chief executive nearly six years ago in May 2010, also expressed some frustration with the recent criticism of the airline at a time when it was back in profit.

“When we were losing $300 million no one said so much as Boo. And now we have posted the biggest profit in the front half since 2010 and everyone is coming out of the woodwork. You kind of scratch your head a bit,” Borghetti told the newspaper.

“Ever since Day One there have been people that have not believed we could achieve things. Analysts in particular because of their short-term thinking are focused on the next reporting period and we always said from the first day I walked in this is a long-term game.”

For just $59.95 a year, you can keep up to date with the very best of Australian Aviation each month, directly via our app! Our app is available on mobile, tablet and PC devices. So what are you waiting for? Go digital with Australian Aviation and read up on all missed special coverage, exclusive photos and editions. Subscribe now at


  • Garry


    Who will be the next airline to fill the gap Virgin are about to vacate or will Qantas just swallow it?

  • adammudhen


    How times change, only 2 year ago it was similar stories, just with Qantas. Perhaps a bit of a shake up is required to sort the wheat from the last 10 years of collected chaff.

    Also, I’ll note there wasn’t a “capacity war they had to fight”, they WERE (along with Qantas) the capacity war. Don’t create a situation then use that as an excuse. They wanted to push Qantas, turns out Big Red had the longer legs.

  • Paul Rodgers


    Just because Luxon from Air New Zealand spits the dummy, doesnt mean Etihad and Singapore wont continue to back Borghetti and Virgin!



    There is usually a very good reason why someone who is considered a walk in to a role is not considered, I think we are staring to see why Qantas overlooked this guy.

  • Dermott


    Maybe Virgin need a better CDO who didn’t work for Qantas

  • Bill


    Sorry John, but that “enormous capacity war” you had to fight was a race to the bottom that you started, and clearly Joyce was prepared to push harder. Face it, trying to become the roo isn’t going to happen.

  • Murray


    Maybe Virgin has to post a $2billion loss like Qantas so the subsequent profits look better to the ratings companies

  • Mark


    What a stupid comment Garry. Virgin will not be going anywhere, it is simply a restructuring process no different to what Qantas went through when they went cap in hand to the government while also threatening they might not be around soon. Now look at Qantas.

  • Andrew Ewen


    The problem is that Virgin are trying to be a second Qantas.

    Australia only has room for one full service carrier.

    The only time in the past Australia had two full service carriers was in the artificially constrained era of the two airline policy with high fares and carriers which did not compete in any meaningful way.

    As soon as the protection of that policy ended Ansett entered its long slow death spiral. Even without the incompetence of the old Air NZ management, and the 11 September attacks they would not have still been around today.

    Virgin could have gone a little bit upmarket compared to their original product, but it was crazy to try to be a second Qantas. There simply isn’t the demand for another Qantas.

    Two separate numerically small widebody fleets only adds to Virgin’s woes. They need to ditch the 777 fleet and forget about trying to compete with the big guys in the AU-US market. Get domestic right and rely on partnerships for longhaul.

    I would hate to see Virgin disappear, but if they don’t start being more realistic I doubt whether they will be around in 5 years, and then the Aussie consumer will be stuck with Qantas/Jetstar as their only domestic options.

    Bailing on the current version of Virgin is one of the smartest moves Air NZ has made in recent years, even if it means they take a bath on their investment.

  • Freddie


    Ditch the A330 and the 777 and return to the original core business. That will immediately reduce costly overheads. There was nothing wrong with that business model and it made money. Who wants a dried out scone or muffin regardless of who serves it?

  • Lyn


    Shame on all of you. How smart we all are to coach from the sidelines. I’ll give you the biggest reason why both airlines are struggling: THE CUSTOMER.
    THE CUSTOMER wanted to fly with more than one option a day. They wanted full service, top notch food and new seats. They wanted direct routes, shorter layovers, Frequent Flyer Status and points redemption, so they could fly for nothing. They wanted to fly in a pair of boardshorts and thongs, or sometimes no shoes at all.
    And they wanted all this for less than the price of an Ipad..
    Air travel used to be an occasion. People paid big money and expected nothing more than a half decent seat with a snack or two during the flight. And airlines made money. These days,people change airlines because the IFE didn’t work properly on a particular flight.
    Virgin and Qantas both need to bring back correct pricing and stop this stupid assumption that people won’t pay. They’ll still pay, but at least they will also wearing shoes.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Each day, our subscribers are more informed with the right information.

SIGN UP to the Australian Aviation magazine for high-quality news and features for just $99.95 per year