DOD's recent decision to transfer ownership of the future Black Hawk battlefield helicopters to the Army marks a significant change in status for the ADF. Army is expected to control the Black Hawks
Army To Take Over RAAF Helicopters
Army Wins Fight to Operate Battlefield Helicopters
The Australian Army has won its brief battle to gain control over the RAAF’s battlefield helicopters. Taking most defence observers by surprise, the late November decision by Defence Minister, Kim Beazley ushers in part one of a longer-term doctrine endorsing many of the recommendations made in the Dibb Report.
The Army battle for control of these traditional Air Force assets was relatively short-lived by modern standards. . From the first suggestion (which was not taken all that seriously at the time by those involved) to implementation took barely half a year, a mere eye wink in time considering the import of what was involved in material and philosophical terms,
What the decision means is that the Army (ADF) will take over the operation of the new Black Hawk helicopters arid what remains of the Iroquois fleet in years to come (refer story elsewhere this issue). The RAAF for its part will now operate only the heavy lift CH-47C Chinook which will remain based at Amberley. Army will take over the operation of No. 9 Squadron RAAF and its new Black Hawks from late 1987 when the first aircraft will roll out for Hawker de Havilland’s facility at Bankstown. This unit will then regroup to Townsville (Garbutt) where new Black Hawk base and maintenance (HdH) facilities are being built. It is not known at this stage if some of the aircraft would operate from nearby Lavarack Barracks though as far as Army is concerned we believe that practically all future group lift Black Hawks would be Townsville-based.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
Similarly, the Army would look to do its own aircrew training and they believe they can save a considerable amount of both time and money by doing it their way. In. Shirt means that they would accept sergeant pilots and NCOs in addition to warrant officers who collectively would be less ‘wage intensive’ than typical RAAF helo aircrews. Similarly, Army pilots would not need to do the Macchi course at RAAF Pearce, a considerable saving jn both time and expense in addition to lessening the flight demands on the new PC-9s and Macchis through the coming decades. Another aspect of flight training being investigated by Army is the use of a contracted civilian agency for the initial stages of flight training. This would not only save a considerable amount of money but would free up facilities within the Army that would be better employed in the operation of the end product – the Black Hawk and other ADF helos.
Meanwhile, the RAAF will remain in control of logistics, as it does for all aircraft regardless of their ownership. Army would ultimately be responsible for the maintenance of such aircraft though in the five year transition period maintenance will be jointly conducted by both RAAFand ADF units. In this regard, Army is also looking to contract out as much heavy maintenance as possible in an effort to further reduce costs and increase unit effectiveness.
It Is anticipated that few RAAF Iroquois pilots would transfer to Army as the rank comparisons between the two services are too divergent to be considered attractive. On the other hand, RAAF is critically short of skilled pilots in many areas, particularly in the LRMP and fighter units and would no doubt find these displaced pilots viable postings in such units. The RAAF will continue, in association with Army, to manage the flight safety programme and handle all airworthiness and aeronautical engineering matters.
Overall, Army see the battlefield helo as just another form of transport – a flying armoured personnel carrier – and consider that their being able to operate the asset a prerequisite to being effective on the modern battlefield. A DOD internal review in September argued against the transfer of the RAAF helicopters six to one. However, in the final countdown, the Ariny and Navy Chiefs outvoted the RAAF with Defence Minister Beazley announcing the historic decision on November 20th.
For the Australian defence forces, it represents a major change in thinking, for Army Aviation the dawn of a new tomorrow while for the RAAF it represents an undeserved defeat and a threat to its future force structure. As one dejected blue suiter said to me recently, “Next the navy will demand our Orions!”.
Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.