Ex RMF Mirages languish at Port Augusta in October 1990 awaiting shipping to a new life in Pakistan. Like many such aircraft they have now been upgraded and put into frontline service, an engineering/integration task that is rapidly becoming a major source of work for many of the remaining military airframe manufacturers. Other aircraft undergoing upgrading to extend their useful lives include Sepecat Jaguars, Northrop F -SE Tiger Ifs and McDonnell Douglas A-4 Skyhawks while later generation types such as the Tornado, F-16, F-15 and Mirage 2000 will also receive similar attention in the years to come rather than be replaced by new types as they would have in years gone by.

Aircraft of the ADF — A21 MDC F/A-18 Hornet

The Industry Consolidates

General Dynamics quit the warplane business in late 1992, reckoning its F-16 line was worth less than the $US1.5 billion that Lockheed had offered for the whole program. Northrop gobbled up Grumman at the beginning of April this year, fending off a bid from Martin Marietta. But a few weeks before, Northrop was itself regarded as a potential takeover target—a business worth more as a mere division of another group than as an independent going concern.

With over 2000Hercules delivered since the mid fifties, Lockheed look set to do well through their next generation Hercules II or C-130J. The Royal Air Force is most likely to become the launch customer whilst our own RMF is not far behind whilst the potential market within the US military over the coming two decades alone could be worth at least 1000 airframes. (Bill Lines & Bruce Malcolm)

It still might be. Northrop has only a slim hope of having independent work next decade. In 1980 the US had eight companies building their own fixed wing combat aircraft: Fairchild (nee Republic), General Dynamics, Grumman, Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Rockwell and Vought. Even then the writing was on the wall for Fairchild and Vought, and they bowed out later in the decade. With Grumman and General Dynamics becoming the first post Cold War casualties, the industry is now down to four. Rockwell and Northrop can only hope for further independent work, so we may yet be left with just Lockheed and McDonnell Douglas.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

It’s the dearth of new programs that’s doing it. In the 1970s and 1980s the Pentagon introduced four new fighters (the F-14, -15, -16 and -18), two attack aircraft (the A-10 and F-117) and two strategic bombers (the B-1 and B-2). Looking ahead from 1994 we can be sure of just two new fast jet programs: Lockheed’s F-22 and, if it qualifies as new, the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18E.

The US fighter industry faced a similar, but not chronic, problem back in the 1960s when one builder had managed to fill all air-to-air and most air-to-ground requirements with one aircraft: the Phantom. By the late 1960s the Phantom was the only US fighter under construction for the Pentagon, with everyone sitting around waiting for it to fall off its perch in the 1970s. It’s going to be a long wait for the F-22 to fall off its perch. As the aircraft now may not even enter service till after 2005. So what are Rockwell and Northrop supposed to do in the meantime?

(left) One feeble ray of hope for what is left of the US military airframe industry is the ultimate Boeing-led design to replace the Harrier 11. This aircraft which will have vertical/short field takeoff?ff capability_married to a supersonic airframe, will actually be offered as an economical, small sized combat aircraft as a _ future replacement for ex,st,ng F-16s, Mirages, M,Gs and early build Hornets. The aircraft has already gained the interest of the British and Boeing is likely to team with another US manufacturer to spread the risk once the programme begins to gain momentum. (right) The stealthy Lockheed/Boeing F-22 Lightning continues to battle its way through Congress and may well even be cancelled yet. At least it is now obvious that the type. will not enter operational service before the end of this century and may be delayed till as late as 201o if some ofits opponents have their way. A delay is not good for Lockheed while outright cancellation would indeed be bad news for Boeing, Lockheed and engine provider Pratt & Whitney.

The great hope is JAST, the Joint Advanced Strike Technology aircraft, which is potentially a third major construction program. Launched by the Pentagon’s 1993 Bottom-Up review of post Cold War defence requirements, JAST is the latest incarnation of the on-again off-again plan to replace the F-111 and A-6 Intruder. Succeeding earlier programmes called ATA (later A-12 Avenger), A-X and A/FX, the modular JAST airframe will also replace the F-15E and F-117 and, as unlikely as it sounds, maybe even the F-16 and AV-8B.

But production will not start for at least a decade, assuming it even survives. That means the builders need work in the meantime. Northrop has its B-2 programmed (recently bestowed the official name Spirit), but only for a few years. On the other hand, buying Grumman has meant scooping up the big job of remodelling the USN’s fleet of F-14 Tomcats into F/A-14 “Bombcats”, another Bottom-Up decision that would see attack capable F-14s filling the gap between the rapidly fading A-6 and whatever JAST ultimately produces.

(left) Hopes of Northrop winning additional orders beyond 20 of the controversial and mega-expensive B-2 Spirit stealth bomber appear dim indeed. Production is set to close around 1996, leaving Northrop largely as a source of Hornet and 747 airframe sections. The company’s recent linking with Grumman though should assist it in being able to use its extensive expertise in developing its integration and systems work, though its days as a pure airframer are certainly well and truly over. (right) The inherent strength and versatility of the basic Hornet design have served McDonnell Douglas well and undoubtedly the extended range F/A-18E will remain in production well into the next century. Future upgrading of early build Hornets and F-16s should provide much useful work for US industry in the absence of specific replacements for these types.

But this does not ensure Northrop’s survival. Probably once the last B-2 rolls through its gold-plated door, the company’s combat aircraft work will be reduced to Hornet components. It could go on indefinitely like that as a parts builder, but it could just as logically become a unit of McDonnell Douglas. JAST would be crucial. Rockwell, inheritor of the great North American tradition, is in even worse shape now that the B-1 programme is over. The 100 Lancers have been delivered and the program will go no further. Which leaves Rockwell with virtually nothing.

(left) Look familiar? An (optimistic) GD artist impression of an F-16 wearing RAAF roundels over the national capital, circa 1976. A massive future market exists in upgrading the F-16, a programme already beginning in the European NATO camp and likely to spread further as Lockheed (who acquired GD last year) has offered USAF 100 new F-16Cs in trade for 400 early build F-16As. The As would then be zero timed and upgraded to virtual C standards and reportedly sold for about half the cost of a new airframe. If this ambitious move succeeds then it will create much work for Lockheed whilst making it even harder for its competitors to sell brand new next generation fighters on the world market. (right) Quite a few USAF F-15A Eagles are presently stored and it is assumed that many of these will be upgraded with some form of ground attack capability before too long. The Eagle offers excellent performance, unprecedented endurance and a copious airframe from which to equip with systems and their accompanying smart weaponry.

But McDonnell Douglas and, especially Lockheed are looking good. MDC is stretching what was once the Northrop P-530 Cobra (a 1960s F-5 successor) beyond recognition into the F/A-18E, a Phantom-sized machine with an expanded fuselage, a bigger wing and lots more internal fuel. Speculating, the F/A-18E might eventually succeed the JAST project if that should lose support in Congress. McDonnell Douglas has a little more F-15 Eagle work to go, plus significant military work in the form of the troubled C-17 Globemaster III airlifter and the T-45 Goshawk trainer.

Lockheed has bounced back from having almost nothing in the 1970s to be the strongest fast-jet builder of the 1990s. Apart from the F-22, which might represent 20 years’ work, it could still squeeze more life out of GD’s F-16. Then there’s Aurora. It’s nice to think there are still big secret projects we have to just speculate about. Judging from numerous sightings and quality press reports, Aurora is Lockheed’s new Mach 5, delta wing reconnaissance aeroplane. Lockheed has received around $US1 billion for a ‘black’ project it is not talking about and analysts say a production run of 24 Auroras would be worth at least $US10 billion.

Lockheed’s position is further strengthened by two successful and long-living military projects in the form of the C-130 Hercules and P-3 Orion. The Hercules in particular will be in an almost untouchable position should the proposed C-130J Hercules II become a reality. A wild card is Boeing, which is again pitching for combat work. In April it got some Pentagon money for V/STOL development. Boeing is currently teamed with Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney, with Rolls-Royce to concentrate on adapting the F119 for STOVL applications.

The cancelled Grumman/McDonnell Douglas A-12 Avenger II never made it to the carrier deck largely through cost overruns and design problems, aggravated by what turned out to be an absurd US Navy requirement that it be able to carry 24 500lb gravity bombs internally! The project’s requirement as an ultimate A-6 replacement (amongst other things) though is now the province of the Joint Advanced Strike Technology aircraft (JAST) which will also serve in USAF colours as an F-111 replacement. JAST could also ultimately replace the F-15E and F-117 and is truly the “Great White Hope” of the US aerospace industry. (right) That there will soon be just two US military airframers is not unique as during the sixties the US acquired the bulk of its air-to-air and air-to-ground capability from just the one manufacturer — McDonnell Douglas — with the legendary Phantom. At one stage at the height of the Vietnam War monthly production of F-4s was logged at 72, an incredible figure by any definition.

Lockheed and McDonnell Douglas are also working on Advanced Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing concepts, although Boeing’s design is understood to be smaller and simpler. Both variants could enter service from 2010. With all its size, Boeing might yet be able to push its way back into warplane construction as a prime contractor. But you would have to say it could have picked a better time to try.

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA