AMATS Implementation – First Impressions

Amats Implementation – First Impressions

The first stage of AMATS has been implemented and contrary to some prior alarmist predictions, the sky has not fallen in.

It is early days yet, however, it was a little sad to recently see a Flight Service Officer fighting a rear guard battle by claiming in a letter to the Canberra Times (Jan 1, 92), that the recent Anglesea tragedy could be related to the changes brought in by the CAA on Dec 12, 91. In the letter, the claim was made that prior to Dec 12, the aircraft would have been in full radio contact with Melbourne Flight Service and that any problems arising could have been advised to the latter. It was further stated that Flight Service could have advised of any hazardous conditions that would have affected the flight.

In a reply through the Canberra Times published on Jan 8, 92, the CAA General Manager Air Traffic Services, Buck Brooksbank, refuted the allegations and stated that although the accident was still under investigation, he could at this point confirm that the aircraft had been in radio contact with Melbourne Flight Service. He then went on to make the point that the CA A encourages the use of radio whenever pilots are in doubt or feel they might be in trouble.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

I felt the CA A could have been stronger in its refutation. In an emergency situation clearly nothing has changed. All that is necessary is to come up on the Flight Service frequency (as before) and cry “help”. In fact I am certain if that was actually done all the necessary assistance would be forthcoming. (A case actually occurred in the UK some years ago when a very frightened trainee pilot caught above cloud could only think of the word “help” – they got him down safely!)

Once a Mayday, Pan or any call for assistance is made on the Flight Service frequency it doesn’t matter whether the aircraft is on full reporting, Sartime or has left an ETA with Mum, the full support of the system will be forthcoming.

Where the problem lies is in a general reluctance to make the initial call. If an engine fails, or a wing drops off, most pilots will not hesitate to broadcast the fact. However, if they have got themselves into a situation through their own fault, most pilots will tend to keep it to themselves, beyond the prudent point of telling someone.

The fear of having an incident report filed on you is a great deterrent to letting the world know that you have screwed it up. There is no easy answer to this one. Clearly if a pilot has breached the rules and this is exposed by him openly admitting it, then something has to be done about it. As always, it comes back to the pilot in command; he must assess the situation as calmly and dispassionately as he can under the circumstances, and then make the decision that its time to seek help.

Returning to AMATS, when I left the military and had to start paying for my flying, I naturally filed full reporting as that was the way I had always done it, even though my flights were now VFR. When the new rules were about to come into force I thought I had better give Sartime a go in readiness for the glorious 12th (however, referring to my earlier comments, there remained at the back of my mind the thought that I would be hung drawn and quartered should I fail to cancel my Sarwatch!)

To my surprise it wasn’t at all painful and there was the added advantage that one could sit back and enjoy the flight without having to worry about ETA:s being within two minutes as planned. The next logical step was to try a cross country under the new rules which invite you to leave your flight details with a responsible person rather than file a Sartime flight plan. After overcoming the problem of a change of telephone number for the pilot briefing room at Canberra (must have missed that one somewhere), as I attempted to check the weather and possible Notams the only other problem turned out to be finding the right words to get a clearance from Canberra Ground to taxi. In the end I decided I would tell them who I was, what I was, where I was going to end up, the route, preferred height,(eastern sector odd plus 500ft, western sector even plus 500ft) ATIS, and POB. It worked fine and we were away. Once released by Canberra Departures I advised Sydney Flight Service that I was listening out and the height I was cruising at. I tried a call on the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency CTAF as we passed over Cootamundra but no one answered (it was Sunday lunch time). At the same time I pondered the 5nm radius and 3000ft AGL for a CTAF and thought that the 5nm was a little tight.

The only other question was how far from the Canberra control zone should I make my call seeking clearance to enter. I decided five minutes from my estimated time to the boundary should be sufficient (105kts G/S); this worked out fine as I received an immediate clearance to enter controlled airspace. What it will be like when we return to a busier situation after the holiday period remains to be seen.

At no time throughout the flight did I feel that we were on our own, Flight Service was there should we have been unlucky enough to have had an emergency.

As I said at the beginning, it is early days yet but indications are that the new procedures are quite painless and are designed to make life easier and more pleasant (and one hopes, cheaper). Lets hope that the rest of the changes are as smoothly implemented as the first

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Australian Aviation a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Australian Aviation as a preferred news source.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2026 MOMENTUMMEDIA