iscover
Boeing has revealed its surprising late contender for the US Navy’s MQ-25 unmanned aerial refuelling system requirement.
After teasing the aviation world by Tweeting an image of the stealthy aircraft with a black sheet over it a few days ago, Boeing released a single image of its MQ-25 contender on December 19, which shows few details apart from a robust landing gear for carrier operations, a large-volume fuselage, and multiple control surfaces.
The MQ-25 requirement evolved from the UCAS an unmanned carrier-borne strike system program, for which Northrop Grumman’s X-47B UCAS-D completed a series of successful demonstrations. An RFT for the MQ-25 was issued in early October, with bids due to be submitted by January 3.
“Boeing has been delivering carrier aircraft to the Navy for almost 90 years,” Boeing Phantom Works refuelling system program head, Don ‘BD’ Gaddis, said in a statement.
“Our expertise gives us confidence in our approach. We will be ready for flight testing when the engineering and manufacturing development contract is awarded.”
Other contenders are expected to be General Atomics with a navalised Avenger/Predator-C, and Lockheed Martin which has shown concepts of a low observable flying wing design.
Despite that early success with the X-47B, Northrop Grumman announced in late October that it would not be submitting a bid for the MQ-25 program.
The MQ-25 is designed to fly with a carrier strike package of F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers and F-35C fighters, and refuel them in flight. This will free up Super Hornets which currently perform this role using a buddy refuelling system.
Fabian
says:this might actually be a great platform for our super hornets one day. even though we have our own tankers this could be certainly a great addition to our refueling fleet
Paul
says:Fabian, our Rhinos have that capability too. Would be a waste of money just to get them to top up the tanks. Just buy another 2-3 tankers that could double up as troop carriers etc. Cheers.
Brent stafford
says:Fleets of these could be used to land water or fuel or protein enriched food drink for humanitarian operations in remote areas. The ruggedised landing gear will assist that.
Paul
says:Brent, I think it’s too small for that. You would rather something much bigger that can carry much more than making a thousand trips! Just my opinion but I could be wrong. Cheers.