Qantas’s first Boeing 787-9 is now under final assembly ahead of its anticipated October delivery date.
A photo posted to Qantas’s Instagram account on Friday shows the fuselage joined to the nose and tail, while the wings were in the process of being attached at Boeing’s Everett facility.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.Forgot password?
To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today! A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
Qantas said recently final assembly would begin on August 10 and take 18 working days to complete, with the aircraft due to roll off the production line by the end of August before entering the paintshop.
The major components for that aircraft, slated to have registration VH-ZNA, such as the nose, tail, fuselage and wings, arrived from their suppliers at Everett at the end of July.
Typically the aircraft would then undertake two test flights with Boeing and then one or two customer acceptance flights ahead of formal handover to Qantas.
==
==
The first four of eight Dreamliners Qantas has on firm order are scheduled to operate six times weekly Melbourne-Los Angeles nonstop flights from December and a daily Melbourne-Perth-London rotation from March 2018.
Peter – Qantas has advised us that the Boeing 787-9 will appear across a wide range of domestic routes in November to ensure that a maximum number of people get to see her and fly on her… especially those from ‘feeder ports’ into the PER-LHR flights (e.g. SYD, MEL, BNE and ADL)
Peter Sutton
says:
It is good to see my Airline Qantas using a very fuel efficient aircraft as the 787-900 as much as the A380 was supposedly going to be cheap to operate it did not seem to live up to any expectations and now world airlines are looking at getting rid of A380s in favour of twin engine aircraft , and with future flying wing concepts being developed by Boeing we have a interesting aviation future ahead
Dr Everline Loh
says:
I cant wait for the new 787. It will be a great addition to the Qantas Family.
James
says:
Would be nice to see one of these Dreamliners visit Canberra.
Ben
says:
Your airline Peter? You own it? I like the look, sleekness and efficiency of the B787 but have flown them on three different airlines now, and the 3x3x3 layout has less seat width space than the B737. Japan Airline’s B787 have a 2x4x2 configuration, a better option. I’ll prefer not to fly a B787. Eg: VA’s B777s are 3x3x3. The B777 width is larger than the B787 for example.
Chris
says:
True that. I prefer and hope to see the A350 for VA in the future.
Jamie
says:
Does this mean come January 2018, our Flight from Melbourne to LA and return will be on the dreamliner instead of the A380?
Craigy
says:
And the repainting of the fleet continues. So far the following have been repainted in the silver roo livery:
Can’t Wait to see the 787 in HK!
will be sad to see the 747’s go tho
Mark
says:
Still not sure what all the fuss is about. I have travelled on the B787 many times and it’s still not even close to the comfort of an A380, while I have not yet flown on the A350, many reports indicate it is also better than the B787.
Rich
says:
Serioulsy, the way QF and the media are carrying on about these aircraft you’d think they’re brand new …… hardly !
They commenced ops in 2011 and today there’s over 500 787’s operating with over 40 carriers, including 11 with JQ (on which I’ve flown half a dozen times) who’s been operating them since 2013. In 2017 it’s just another aeroplance folks, move on.
Yota Takeshima
says:
What aircraft will QF25/26 get flown by when all of the 744s retire?
A330?787?
Aussie20
says:
Glad QF’s getting back to Boeing aircraft. It had been a purchaser of them, for decades’, then they got the A380. Retrograde step.
Don’t like Airbus, of any type, & won’t fly on them.
Have been on B787, & really enjoyed the experience.
Will be happy to board a QF one!
Roger
says:
Craigy, yes, OQK hasn’t flown in just under a month, so I would assume that it is being painted.
Craig, when does QF95 fly? I can only see flights for QF93. Didn’t QF17 also be a flight from MEL-LAX at some stage?
Mark, I agree that A380s are more comfortable than 787s due to the lower cabin noise and wider cabin. I think that designing 787s for long-haul was a bad move, however I can see that Boeing needed some new popular aircraft in which to implement their new oxygen-producing system and other enhancements.
Aussie20, though I do agree that 787s do provide a nice experience, and also considering that many people seem to prefer the A380 and A350 over the 787, you should give a modern Airbus aircraft a try to see how you like them. Saying that you would never fly on one shows how you are unwilling to step outside your comfort zone–how can you say that you do not like something if you have not tried it yourself?
RS
says:
I do not understand the rationale for the non stop Perth to London flight. It is environmentally unsound and wasteful of fuel to lug 50 tonnes of fuel half way to London just so the 787 can fly the second half of the journey. It is less economic that it might otherwise be if the 787 is payload limited by 50% because it has to carry so much fuel. It is uncomfortable for economy passengers to sit in narrower seats than Qantas use for other aircraft for 17 hours. It is only marginally less time consuming (17.20 hrs compared with a stop over in Dubai 19.40hrs), For passengers travelling from Sydney it takes longer and costs more.. If you are an executive from Perth who can afford a more expensive seat the non stop flight may be for you, Otherwise it seems to me to be a status thing for Qantas to undertake and an extravagant use of a high tech aircraft which is designed to carry a full payload over ranges such as Perth- Dubai and not Perth-London
Jack
says:
Guys, I can’t see why you’re so thrilled about the Boeing 787-9. Of course its a great airliner and its new, but haven’t you been following the threads about their configuration for the aircraft? The Legroom isn’t what bothers me, It’s the width. You’d think that since Qantas is the ‘Spirit of Australia’ It would be a bit more roomy, but they’re giving us only 17 inches of width. That’s Jetstar 787 economy class. I would get onto an A350. They’re quiter, they also have a nicer interior, they’re more fuel efficient, safer and have had no incidents whatsoever even though they’re 3 years old. But most importantly, they’re more comfortable, they have the same seating configuration as the 787, but you get more width on the airplane. 18 inches is standard on most Airbus Aircraft, Also, the air inside is more humidified so you can taste the food you eat! so i’d hold your breath on the 787. Don’t get too excited. Its got a name. Thats all its good for. The A350 has less of a name to most, but its better in almost every way. If you want to see my point of view, I’d recommend doing some research.
Aussie20
says:
To Roger…..
Your criticism of my thoughts on Airbus is rather heavy-handed.
You’ve no idea of what I’ve flown on, & it always remains MY choice which type of aircraft I’ll board.
ESLowe
says:
A small point, but one of interest to me. I commented to QANTAS that I enjoyed the sky camera on the A380’s tail and hoped they’d included this on their 787s. They said the’d pass that onto their engineering department. They may have just being adhering to customer relations policy, but it would be nice if they included the tail camera.
Craig
says:
@ Roger
QF95/96 has been the second Melb -LA service using the B744. I think it was 4 days a week at one stage but the B789 will do the service 6 days a week.
@ RS
Qantas have run the numbers and think it is economic. If you have done your own payload v cost analysis, perhaps you should forward it to Qantas.
stig
says:
why can’t it be to brisbane or gold coast? that would be so much better!
Craigy
says:
The first B789 is now in position 2 on the production line. Finishing the electrical connections and installing the floor.
Re OQK. According to Flightaware it is in Manilla so maintenance and probably a new paint job
Philip
says:
I agree with previous negative comments re 3 3 3 seat layout.
Having taken one flight on Jetstar 787 i will avoid future flights on any 787 with 3 3 3
Qantas have missed a great opportunity to be superior to other 787 operators.
I will continue to look for flights with suitable airlines that use A330 with 2 4 2 layout
David
says:
Philip, are there any airlines that use the 2 4 2 layout?
John Reid
says:
Philip – I have yet to fly 787 but will have a LATAM 3-3-3 one next month – eagerly anticipating, though maybe I shouldn’t!
However I understand Y (cattle) class on QF 787s will be 3-FOUR-3 on 17.5″ seats – just what you need for a long hop Perth-LHR. Fortunately I live in Canberra so will now choose to exit Oz via Sydney QF1 A380 by preference – or some other airline.
Craigy
says:
@ John Reid. No Qantas will be 3-3-3
Philip
says:
Yes David there are airlines with 2 4 2 on A330’s
Have just returned BKK -Syd on Qantas A330 with 2 4 2
Both Malaysian and SQ also have 2 4 2 on their A330’s
Cathay are currently converting to 3 3 3
David
says:
John Reid, Qantas have said the 787 will have a 3 3 3 seat arrangement in economy.
Markie
says:
VH-OQK is in MNL and is scheduled out on 6th Sep from memory. Not sure if it’s getting a new livery though.
Peter
says:Are they still going to be used on Domestic services first up for crew training / familiarisation as first mentioned when they were announced?
David
says:Peter – yes, except to see the Boeing 787-9 across a wide spread of domestic routes in November
David
says:Peter – Qantas has advised us that the Boeing 787-9 will appear across a wide range of domestic routes in November to ensure that a maximum number of people get to see her and fly on her… especially those from ‘feeder ports’ into the PER-LHR flights (e.g. SYD, MEL, BNE and ADL)
Peter Sutton
says:It is good to see my Airline Qantas using a very fuel efficient aircraft as the 787-900 as much as the A380 was supposedly going to be cheap to operate it did not seem to live up to any expectations and now world airlines are looking at getting rid of A380s in favour of twin engine aircraft , and with future flying wing concepts being developed by Boeing we have a interesting aviation future ahead
Dr Everline Loh
says:I cant wait for the new 787. It will be a great addition to the Qantas Family.
James
says:Would be nice to see one of these Dreamliners visit Canberra.
Ben
says:Your airline Peter? You own it? I like the look, sleekness and efficiency of the B787 but have flown them on three different airlines now, and the 3x3x3 layout has less seat width space than the B737. Japan Airline’s B787 have a 2x4x2 configuration, a better option. I’ll prefer not to fly a B787. Eg: VA’s B777s are 3x3x3. The B777 width is larger than the B787 for example.
Chris
says:True that. I prefer and hope to see the A350 for VA in the future.
Jamie
says:Does this mean come January 2018, our Flight from Melbourne to LA and return will be on the dreamliner instead of the A380?
Craigy
says:And the repainting of the fleet continues. So far the following have been repainted in the silver roo livery:
F100 NHP
A333 QPH, QPI, QPJ
DH8C SBB
B738 VXM, VYD, VYE,
I haven’t seen OQK of late so guessing it is in heavy maintenance and may well return in the new livery
Alex
says:Second Ben’s thoughts, flown SQ on their A350 and it is miles ahead of a 787.
Qantas should at least consider the ULR version for point to point long haul because 17+ hours in a dreamliner is frankly going to be a nightmare.
Craig
says:@ Jamie If you are booked on QF93/94, that will be an A380. QF95/96 will be the dreamliner
Jakob the Slav
says:Can’t Wait to see the 787 in HK!
will be sad to see the 747’s go tho
Mark
says:Still not sure what all the fuss is about. I have travelled on the B787 many times and it’s still not even close to the comfort of an A380, while I have not yet flown on the A350, many reports indicate it is also better than the B787.
Rich
says:Serioulsy, the way QF and the media are carrying on about these aircraft you’d think they’re brand new …… hardly !
They commenced ops in 2011 and today there’s over 500 787’s operating with over 40 carriers, including 11 with JQ (on which I’ve flown half a dozen times) who’s been operating them since 2013. In 2017 it’s just another aeroplance folks, move on.
Yota Takeshima
says:What aircraft will QF25/26 get flown by when all of the 744s retire?
A330?787?
Aussie20
says:Glad QF’s getting back to Boeing aircraft. It had been a purchaser of them, for decades’, then they got the A380. Retrograde step.
Don’t like Airbus, of any type, & won’t fly on them.
Have been on B787, & really enjoyed the experience.
Will be happy to board a QF one!
Roger
says:Craigy, yes, OQK hasn’t flown in just under a month, so I would assume that it is being painted.
Craig, when does QF95 fly? I can only see flights for QF93. Didn’t QF17 also be a flight from MEL-LAX at some stage?
Mark, I agree that A380s are more comfortable than 787s due to the lower cabin noise and wider cabin. I think that designing 787s for long-haul was a bad move, however I can see that Boeing needed some new popular aircraft in which to implement their new oxygen-producing system and other enhancements.
Aussie20, though I do agree that 787s do provide a nice experience, and also considering that many people seem to prefer the A380 and A350 over the 787, you should give a modern Airbus aircraft a try to see how you like them. Saying that you would never fly on one shows how you are unwilling to step outside your comfort zone–how can you say that you do not like something if you have not tried it yourself?
RS
says:I do not understand the rationale for the non stop Perth to London flight. It is environmentally unsound and wasteful of fuel to lug 50 tonnes of fuel half way to London just so the 787 can fly the second half of the journey. It is less economic that it might otherwise be if the 787 is payload limited by 50% because it has to carry so much fuel. It is uncomfortable for economy passengers to sit in narrower seats than Qantas use for other aircraft for 17 hours. It is only marginally less time consuming (17.20 hrs compared with a stop over in Dubai 19.40hrs), For passengers travelling from Sydney it takes longer and costs more.. If you are an executive from Perth who can afford a more expensive seat the non stop flight may be for you, Otherwise it seems to me to be a status thing for Qantas to undertake and an extravagant use of a high tech aircraft which is designed to carry a full payload over ranges such as Perth- Dubai and not Perth-London
Jack
says:Guys, I can’t see why you’re so thrilled about the Boeing 787-9. Of course its a great airliner and its new, but haven’t you been following the threads about their configuration for the aircraft? The Legroom isn’t what bothers me, It’s the width. You’d think that since Qantas is the ‘Spirit of Australia’ It would be a bit more roomy, but they’re giving us only 17 inches of width. That’s Jetstar 787 economy class. I would get onto an A350. They’re quiter, they also have a nicer interior, they’re more fuel efficient, safer and have had no incidents whatsoever even though they’re 3 years old. But most importantly, they’re more comfortable, they have the same seating configuration as the 787, but you get more width on the airplane. 18 inches is standard on most Airbus Aircraft, Also, the air inside is more humidified so you can taste the food you eat! so i’d hold your breath on the 787. Don’t get too excited. Its got a name. Thats all its good for. The A350 has less of a name to most, but its better in almost every way. If you want to see my point of view, I’d recommend doing some research.
Aussie20
says:To Roger…..
Your criticism of my thoughts on Airbus is rather heavy-handed.
You’ve no idea of what I’ve flown on, & it always remains MY choice which type of aircraft I’ll board.
ESLowe
says:A small point, but one of interest to me. I commented to QANTAS that I enjoyed the sky camera on the A380’s tail and hoped they’d included this on their 787s. They said the’d pass that onto their engineering department. They may have just being adhering to customer relations policy, but it would be nice if they included the tail camera.
Craig
says:@ Roger
QF95/96 has been the second Melb -LA service using the B744. I think it was 4 days a week at one stage but the B789 will do the service 6 days a week.
@ RS
Qantas have run the numbers and think it is economic. If you have done your own payload v cost analysis, perhaps you should forward it to Qantas.
stig
says:why can’t it be to brisbane or gold coast? that would be so much better!
Craigy
says:The first B789 is now in position 2 on the production line. Finishing the electrical connections and installing the floor.
Re OQK. According to Flightaware it is in Manilla so maintenance and probably a new paint job
Philip
says:I agree with previous negative comments re 3 3 3 seat layout.
Having taken one flight on Jetstar 787 i will avoid future flights on any 787 with 3 3 3
Qantas have missed a great opportunity to be superior to other 787 operators.
I will continue to look for flights with suitable airlines that use A330 with 2 4 2 layout
David
says:Philip, are there any airlines that use the 2 4 2 layout?
John Reid
says:Philip – I have yet to fly 787 but will have a LATAM 3-3-3 one next month – eagerly anticipating, though maybe I shouldn’t!
However I understand Y (cattle) class on QF 787s will be 3-FOUR-3 on 17.5″ seats – just what you need for a long hop Perth-LHR. Fortunately I live in Canberra so will now choose to exit Oz via Sydney QF1 A380 by preference – or some other airline.
Craigy
says:@ John Reid. No Qantas will be 3-3-3
Philip
says:Yes David there are airlines with 2 4 2 on A330’s
Have just returned BKK -Syd on Qantas A330 with 2 4 2
Both Malaysian and SQ also have 2 4 2 on their A330’s
Cathay are currently converting to 3 3 3
David
says:John Reid, Qantas have said the 787 will have a 3 3 3 seat arrangement in economy.
Markie
says:VH-OQK is in MNL and is scheduled out on 6th Sep from memory. Not sure if it’s getting a new livery though.